incompatibility

App is incompatible with all devices after publishing to the Market but same was working when moved directly to the device

南楼画角 提交于 2019-11-29 04:37:33
I have developed an app using PhoneGap and tested the same in different version of emulator and also in my Motorola Photon. I have not faced any problem in testing. But when I published the same in the market it says "This app is incompatible with all of your devices.". My devices are with different screen size, different OS version ranging from 2.1 to 2.4. In publish home page, it says "This application is available to over 679 devices." It includes Motorola Photon 4g and all other devices which I have registered in the market download. I have republished the code many times by updating

iPhone SDK on Windows (alternative solutions)

[亡魂溺海] 提交于 2019-11-28 03:12:29
I know there is no official SDK for Windows, which is very annoying. Is there any way to develop applications on a Windows computer, other than somehow running a Mac OS in VMware? I know you can do it with Xcode, but that is also only for Mac OS X. Google searches have revealed absolutely nothing. If I cannot use the SDK or Xcode, is there any way I can just check syntax or something and just make my code in Notepad and save it with the proper extension? I have no idea whether or not I would be able to do that, probably because I have never even tried the SDK and probably never will without

16-bit Assembly on 64-bit Windows?

人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-11-28 02:00:50
I decided to start learning assembly a while ago, and so I started with 16-bit assembly, using FASMW. HOwever, I recently got a really new computer running Windows 7 64-bit, and now none of the compiled .COM files that the program assembles work anymore. they give an error message saying that the .COM is not compatible with 64-bit windows. 32-bit assemblies still work, however i'd rather start with 16 and work my way up... Is it possible to run a 16-bit program on windows 7? or is there a specific way to compile them? or should i give up and skip to 32-bit instead? The reason you can't use 16

App is incompatible with all devices after publishing to the Market but same was working when moved directly to the device

妖精的绣舞 提交于 2019-11-27 18:41:56
问题 I have developed an app using PhoneGap and tested the same in different version of emulator and also in my Motorola Photon. I have not faced any problem in testing. But when I published the same in the market it says "This app is incompatible with all of your devices.". My devices are with different screen size, different OS version ranging from 2.1 to 2.4. In publish home page, it says "This application is available to over 679 devices." It includes Motorola Photon 4g and all other devices

Javascript getters/setters in IE?

落爺英雄遲暮 提交于 2019-11-27 14:20:24
For whatever reason, Javascript getters/setters for custom objects seem to work with any browser but IE. Does IE have any other non-standard mechanism for this? (As with many other features) If not, are there any workarounds to achieve the same functionality? Nosredna IE8 has it through defineProperty , but only for DOM objects. But supposedly, it'll eventually come for JavaScript objects as well. linusthe3rd Resig's post references his env.js implementation being the first time he uses the getters and setters methodology you are looking for. The reason this style of works fine for him is

iPhone SDK on Windows (alternative solutions)

元气小坏坏 提交于 2019-11-27 05:05:24
问题 I know there is no official SDK for Windows, which is very annoying. Is there any way to develop applications on a Windows computer, other than somehow running a Mac OS in VMware? I know you can do it with Xcode, but that is also only for Mac OS X. Google searches have revealed absolutely nothing. If I cannot use the SDK or Xcode, is there any way I can just check syntax or something and just make my code in Notepad and save it with the proper extension? I have no idea whether or not I would

Why source command doesn't work with process substitution in bash 3.2?

只谈情不闲聊 提交于 2019-11-26 19:08:58
I've the following shell script: cat <(echo foo) source <(echo bar=bar) echo $bar However it works differently in GNU bash 3.2 and 4.3 as shown below: $ /bin/bash foo.sh foo 3.2.53(1)-release $ /usr/local/bin/bash foo.sh foo bar 4.3.33(1)-release Why this works only on one version? Is it a bug or added feature? It seems the process substitution works fine, however problem lay when sourcing the file. If this is expected behaviour, what other syntax should I use instead to source something from the standard input to be compatible between different bash versions? This is a known limitation in

Why source command doesn&#39;t work with process substitution in bash 3.2?

微笑、不失礼 提交于 2019-11-26 06:07:52
问题 I\'ve the following shell script: cat <(echo foo) source <(echo bar=bar) echo $bar However it works differently in GNU bash 3.2 and 4.3 as shown below: $ /bin/bash foo.sh foo 3.2.53(1)-release $ /usr/local/bin/bash foo.sh foo bar 4.3.33(1)-release Why this works only on one version? Is it a bug or added feature? It seems the process substitution works fine, however problem lay when sourcing the file. If this is expected behaviour, what other syntax should I use instead to source something