git-squash | 易学教程

Git: How to convert an existing `merge` to a `merge --squash`?

阅读更多关于 Git: How to convert an existing `merge` to a `merge --squash`?

问题 I performed multiple merge commits but they should have been merge --squash instead. The conflict resolution took more than a day so I can't afford to redo the merging by hand. Is there a way to convert the merge to merge --squash ? 回答1: It's worth noting here that git merge and git merge --squash are closely related, but git merge --squash does not create a merge . The phrasing here is very important, particularly the article "a" in front of "merge": "a merge" is a noun, while "to merge" is

Git: How to convert an existing `merge` to a `merge --squash`?

阅读更多关于 Git: How to convert an existing `merge` to a `merge --squash`?

git interactive rebase squash into next commit

阅读更多关于 git interactive rebase squash into next commit

问题 In Git I can use an interactive rebase to re-write history, this is great because in my feature branch I made a ton of commits with partially working code as I explored different refactors and ways of getting it done. I'd like to squash a lot of the commits together before rebasing or merging the branch onto master. Some made up commits in order from first (top) to bottom (last) 1. Initial commit on feature branch "Automatic coffee maker UI" 2. Add hot chocolate as product 3. Add tea as

Git merge with --squash while keeping log of every commit

阅读更多关于 Git merge with --squash while keeping log of every commit

问题 Initial scenario: A (master) \ B - C - D (development) What I want after merge --squash: A - E (master/development) \ / B - C - D On branch master , git log would be commit E Squashed commit of the following: commit D commit C commit B commit A Keep developing on branch development : A - E (master) \ / \ B - C - D F - G - H (development) Merge with squash again: A - E - I(master/development) \ / \ / B - C - D F - G - H On branch master , git log would be commit I Squashed commit of the

Git squash commits in the middle of a branch

阅读更多关于 Git squash commits in the middle of a branch

问题 I want to squash several commits together in the middle of a branch without modifying the commits before and after. I have : A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G | | master dev origin/master I want to squash that into A -- H -- E -- F -- G | | master dev origin/master Where H is equivalent to B -- C -- D . And I want to be able to specify the commit message of H . A is the last commit that has been pushed so all commits after that can be rewritten without messing up the server. The idea is to

Git - squash entire branch - one line squash command

阅读更多关于 Git - squash entire branch - one line squash command

问题 while I am working on new code I make many small commits to track my changes. My company however prefers each feature to be committed in a single commit. So the solution is to squash my entire branch down to a single commit. How do I squash an entire branch without using git rebase --interactive and then changing pick to squash for all the commits? 回答1: My preferred method is a two-liner (excluding steps 1 and 4 below). The benefits are you do not need to know/record any commit IDs, you can

Git: How to convert an existing `merge` to a `merge --squash`?

阅读更多关于 Git: How to convert an existing `merge` to a `merge --squash`?

I performed multiple merge commits but they should have been merge --squash instead. The conflict resolution took more than a day so I can't afford to redo the merging by hand. Is there a way to convert the merge to merge --squash ? It's worth noting here that git merge and git merge --squash are closely related, but git merge --squash does not create a merge . The phrasing here is very important, particularly the article "a" in front of "merge": "a merge" is a noun, while "to merge" is a verb. Both commands perform the act of merging. The difference lies in how the result is saved . It's also

Intellij - How to squash local branch only

阅读更多关于 Intellij - How to squash local branch only

问题 When using Git inside of Intellij, how do I squash all of my commits for a local branch? What settings do I use in the rebase branch window? I've tried setting the Onto to local/master and From to my branch, but then it goes and tries to merge master changes into my branch for each commit I did, even tho I typically rebase my branch onto master every morning...so there SHOULD be no conflicts. Yet it almost always finds conflicts and causes merge issues. I ONLY want to squash the branch

Gitflow: Should I squash commits when merging from a release branch into master?

阅读更多关于 Gitflow: Should I squash commits when merging from a release branch into master?

问题 I am going to merge my release branch to master and I am wondering if I should squash the commits from develop into a single merge commit when merging into master. General documentations about git flow contain figures like this one from in the Atlassian page: In those figures only single commits appear on master instead of all commits made to develop. Acctually, I like the idea of having a master branch which release commits only. Should I retain all commits on develop when merging into

Intellij - How to squash local branch only

阅读更多关于 Intellij - How to squash local branch only

When using Git inside of Intellij, how do I squash all of my commits for a local branch? What settings do I use in the rebase branch window? I've tried setting the Onto to local/master and From to my branch, but then it goes and tries to merge master changes into my branch for each commit I did, even tho I typically rebase my branch onto master every morning...so there SHOULD be no conflicts. Yet it almost always finds conflicts and causes merge issues. I ONLY want to squash the branch commits and messages so when I push to Github it only sees one. It might be a little uncomfortable but you