data-integrity

How to verify a git merge contains no extra changes?

淺唱寂寞╮ 提交于 2019-12-09 13:26:21
问题 In git, how do I verify that a merge upstream master commit does not contain any additional diffs? Say I want to verify that the person didn't do anything 'sneaky' besides actually merge the changes from the upstream master branch. I want to verify that the only diffs come from the other commits they made; that they did not perform an 'evil merge'. Is there a way to verify that no additional changes were made during the merge step? Or better yet: show me the potential 'evil merge' diffs so I

Deletions in a many-to-many structure

ⅰ亾dé卋堺 提交于 2019-12-09 07:48:54
问题 I just want to check really quickly. Say I have two entities in a data model: Catalog, and Product. They have a many-to-many relationship with each other, and both are required (a Catalog must have at least one Product, and all Products must each belong to at least one Catalog). So if I was to delete a Product, its deletion should be Nullify, of course. But what should the deletion policy be for Catalog? If a Catalog is deleted, not all of its Products necessarily exclusively belong to it. A

What is Relational Integrity [closed]

我是研究僧i 提交于 2019-12-07 16:31:01
问题 Closed . This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post. Closed 10 months ago . In the question How to Set Up Primary Keys in a Relation, PerformanceDBA talked about Relational Integrity and pointed out that it is different from Referential Integrity . I have heard of Referential Integrity , which is related to Foreign Keys . But Relational Integrity seems

Cassandra is configured to lose 10 seconds of data by default?

随声附和 提交于 2019-12-07 05:09:42
问题 As the data in the Commitlog is flushed to the disk periodically after every 10 seconds (controlled by commitlog_sync_period_in_ms ), so if all replicas crash within 10 seconds, will I lose all that data? Does it mean that, theoretically, a Cassandra Cluster can lose data? 回答1: If a node crashed right before updating the commit log on disk, then yes, you could lose up to ten seconds of data. If you keep multiple replicas, by using a replication factor higher than 1 or have multiple data

Does TLS ensure message integrity and confidentiality of data transmission in a RESTful Java enterprise

旧时模样 提交于 2019-12-07 01:56:55
问题 I want to apply web service security according to OWASP Web Service Security. Thereby I stumbled over the two points: Message Integrity Message Confidentiality So far there is just a RESTful service which can be directly accessed by a client. For each request the client needs to authenticate by the server. All communication is secured via TLS. I'm now unsure about Message Integrity since I don't understand the sentence: When using public key cryptography, encryption does guarantee

Cassandra is configured to lose 10 seconds of data by default?

一曲冷凌霜 提交于 2019-12-05 08:59:48
As the data in the Commitlog is flushed to the disk periodically after every 10 seconds (controlled by commitlog_sync_period_in_ms ), so if all replicas crash within 10 seconds, will I lose all that data? Does it mean that, theoretically, a Cassandra Cluster can lose data? If a node crashed right before updating the commit log on disk, then yes, you could lose up to ten seconds of data. If you keep multiple replicas, by using a replication factor higher than 1 or have multiple data centers, then much of the lost data would be on other nodes, and would be recovered on the crashed node when it

Does TLS ensure message integrity and confidentiality of data transmission in a RESTful Java enterprise

試著忘記壹切 提交于 2019-12-05 08:43:09
I want to apply web service security according to OWASP Web Service Security . Thereby I stumbled over the two points: Message Integrity Message Confidentiality So far there is just a RESTful service which can be directly accessed by a client. For each request the client needs to authenticate by the server. All communication is secured via TLS. I'm now unsure about Message Integrity since I don't understand the sentence: When using public key cryptography, encryption does guarantee confidentiality but it does not guarantee integrity since the receiver's public key is public. For the same

C++ Is private really private?

别来无恙 提交于 2019-12-04 22:40:02
I was trying out the validity of private access specifier in C++. Here goes: Interface: // class_A.h class A { public: void printX(); private: void actualPrintX(); int x; }; Implementation: // class_A.cpp void A::printX() { actualPrintX(); } void A::actualPrintX() { std::cout << x: } I built this in to a static library (.a/.lib). We now have a class_A.h and classA.a (or classA.lib) pair. I edited class_A.h and removed the private: from it. Now in another classTester.cpp: #include "class_A.h" // the newly edited header int main() { A a; a.x = 12; // both G++ and VC++ allowed this! a.printX(); /

Opening Hours Database Design

房东的猫 提交于 2019-12-03 14:53:28
问题 We are currently developing an application in which multiple entities have associated opening hours. Opening hours may span multiple days, or may be contained within a single day. Ex. Opens Monday at 6:00 and closes at Friday at 18:00. Or Opens Monday at 06:00 and closes Monday at 15:00. Also, an entity may have multiple sets of opening hours per day. So far, the best design I have found, is to define an opening hour to consist of the following: StartDay, StartTime, EndDay and EndTime. This

Deletions in a many-to-many structure

不羁岁月 提交于 2019-12-03 10:47:14
I just want to check really quickly. Say I have two entities in a data model: Catalog, and Product. They have a many-to-many relationship with each other, and both are required (a Catalog must have at least one Product, and all Products must each belong to at least one Catalog). So if I was to delete a Product, its deletion should be Nullify, of course. But what should the deletion policy be for Catalog? If a Catalog is deleted, not all of its Products necessarily exclusively belong to it. A Product may belong to more than one Catalog. So I definitely shouldn't use Cascade. However, is Nullify