content-length

How to expand 'select' option width after the user wants to select an option

由 人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-11-27 13:09:10
Maybe this is an easy question, maybe not. I have a select box where I hardcode with width. Say 120px. <select style="width: 120px"> <option>REALLY LONG TEXT, REALLY LONG TEXT, REALLY LONG TEXT</option> <option>ABC</option> </select> I want to be able to show the second option so that the user can see the full length of the text. Like everything else. This works fine in Firefox, but doesn't work with Internet Explorer6. Tomalak If you have the option pre-existing in a fixed-with <select> , and you don't want to change the width programmatically, you could be out of luck unless you get a little

How to set content-length in android?

由 喜你入骨 提交于 2019-11-27 08:25:43
问题 I want to get content size by request.getContentLength() in server client JSP page. But request.getContentLength() always return -1, i do not why? Android snippet code: URL uri = new URL(actionUrl); HttpURLConnection conn = (HttpURLConnection) uri.openConnection(); //conn.setChunkedStreamingMode(100); conn.setConnectTimeout(setTimeOut>0?setTimeOut:timeoutConnection); conn.setReadTimeout(setTimeOut>0?setTimeOut:timeoutConnection); conn.setDoInput(true); conn.setDoOutput(true); conn

Content-Length header versus chunked encoding

由 丶灬走出姿态 提交于 2019-11-27 06:41:12
I'm trying to weigh the pros and cons of setting the Content-Length HTTP header versus using chunked encoding to return [possibly] large files from my server. One or the other is needed to be compliant with HTTP 1.1 specs using persistent connections. I see the advantage of the Content-Length header being : Download dialogs can show accurate progress bar Client knows upfront if the file may/may not be too large for them to ingest The downside is having to calculate the size before you return the object which isn't always practical and could add to server/database utilization. The downside of

Node Express Content-Length

由 天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-11-27 01:33:36
问题 I use node.js and express at a small project. I set response header like blow: res.set({'Content-Type':'text/plain;charset=utf-8', 'Content-Length': Buffer.byteLength(data, 'utf-8')}); I can use console.log print data's length is 317. But at browser's console, I just get these: Connection:keep-alive Content-Encoding:gzip Content-Type:text/plain;charset=utf-8 Date:Sat, 01 Jun 2013 08:21:59 GMT Transfer-Encoding:chunked Vary:Accept-Encoding X-Powered-By:Express So, why the content-length

How to expand 'select' option width after the user wants to select an option

由 谁说我不能喝 提交于 2019-11-26 16:13:34
问题 Maybe this is an easy question, maybe not. I have a select box where I hardcode with width. Say 120px. <select style="width: 120px"> <option>REALLY LONG TEXT, REALLY LONG TEXT, REALLY LONG TEXT</option> <option>ABC</option> </select> I want to be able to show the second option so that the user can see the full length of the text. Like everything else. This works fine in Firefox, but doesn't work with Internet Explorer6. 回答1: If you have the option pre-existing in a fixed-with <select> , and

Content-Length header versus chunked encoding

由 情到浓时终转凉″ 提交于 2019-11-26 12:07:14
问题 I\'m trying to weigh the pros and cons of setting the Content-Length HTTP header versus using chunked encoding to return [possibly] large files from my server. One or the other is needed to be compliant with HTTP 1.1 specs using persistent connections. I see the advantage of the Content-Length header being : Download dialogs can show accurate progress bar Client knows upfront if the file may/may not be too large for them to ingest The downside is having to calculate the size before you return
订阅 content-length