configobj

最全总结 | 聊聊 Python 数据处理全家桶（配置篇）

由 十年热恋 提交于 2020-11-22 13:42:05
聊聊 Python 数据处理全家桶（Memca 篇） Python实战社群 Java实战社群 长按识别下方二维码， 按需求添加 扫码关注添加客服 进Python社群▲ 扫码关注添加客服 进Java社群 ▲ 作者丨星安果 来源丨AirPython 1.前言 在实际项目中，经常会接触到各种各样的配置文件，它可以增强项目的可维护性 常用配件文件的处理方式，包含：JSON、ini / config、YAML、XML 等 本篇文章，我们将聊聊 Python 数据处理全家桶之配置文件大总结 2.JSON Python 内置了 JSON 模块，可以非常方便操作 JSON 数据 常见的 4 个方法分别是： json.load(json_file) 解析 JSON 文件，转换为 Python 中对应的数据类型 json.loads(json_string) 解析 JSON 格式的字符串，结果为 Python 中的字典 json.dump(python_content,file_path) 将 Python 数据，包含：dict、list 写入到文件中 json.dumps(python_dict) 将 Python 中 dict 转为 JSON 格式的字符串 以下面这段 JSON 配置文件为例： #config.json { "mysql": { "host": "198.0.0.1", "port

Retrieving values from nested python dicts with dot notation [duplicate]

由 我的未来我决定 提交于 2019-12-11 11:48:25
问题 This question already has answers here : Accessing dict keys like an attribute? (25 answers) Closed 3 years ago . I'm currently using ConfigObj in a project of mine to have structured text based configuration files, and it's pretty neat. The data structure it returns is a normal dict type, which in my case could contain lots of other dicts as values, which themselves could contain dicts, and so on. I'm looking for the most pythonic way to wrap the main dict with a class in order to implement

What's better, ConfigObj or ConfigParser?

由 做~自己de王妃 提交于 2019-12-09 04:18:10
问题 Which is better for creating a settings file for Python programs, the built-in module (ConfigParser), or the independent project (ConfigObj)? 回答1: I recently switched from configparser to configobj, and I'm thrilled to have done so. For me, the big difference is configobj's validator. It lets me very easily/succinctly (1) define the type and acceptable values for each entry, and (2) set defaults. Those two features save me a lot of code and prevent a lot from going wrong. Plus, there's really

What's better, ConfigObj or ConfigParser?

由 梦想的初衷 提交于 2019-12-03 02:30:49
Which is better for creating a settings file for Python programs, the built-in module ( ConfigParser ), or the independent project ( ConfigObj )? rdchambers I recently switched from configparser to configobj, and I'm thrilled to have done so. For me, the big difference is configobj's validator . It lets me very easily/succinctly (1) define the type and acceptable values for each entry, and (2) set defaults. Those two features save me a lot of code and prevent a lot from going wrong. Plus, there's really no extra overhead to using configobj in terms of the complexity of my code, and the library
订阅 configobj