compiled-language | 易学教程

Is Ruby a scripting language or an interpreted language?

阅读更多关于 Is Ruby a scripting language or an interpreted language?

问题 I just noticed that in the wikipedia page of Ruby, this language is defined as interpreted language. I understood that probably there's something missing in my background. I have always known the difference between an interpreted language that doesn't need a compiler and a compiled language (who require to be compiled before the execution of programs), but what characterize a scripting language ? Is Ruby definable as a scripting language ? Thank you and forgive me for the black out 回答1:

Is Bash an interpreted language?

阅读更多关于 Is Bash an interpreted language?

问题 From what I've read so far, bash seems to fit the defintion of an interpreted language: it is not compiled into a lower format every statement ends up calling a subroutine / set of subroutines already translated into machine code (i.e. echo foo calls a precompiled executable) the interpreter itself, bash , has already been compiled However, I could not find a reference to bash on Wikipedia's page for interpreted languages, or by extensive searches on Google. I've also found a page on

Is Bash an interpreted language?

阅读更多关于 Is Bash an interpreted language?

From what I've read so far, bash seems to fit the defintion of an interpreted language: it is not compiled into a lower format every statement ends up calling a subroutine / set of subroutines already translated into machine code (i.e. echo foo calls a precompiled executable) the interpreter itself, bash , has already been compiled However, I could not find a reference to bash on Wikipedia's page for interpreted languages , or by extensive searches on Google. I've also found a page on Programmers Stack Exchange that seems to imply that bash is not an interpreted language- if it's not, then

Is Perl a compiled or an interpreted programming language?

阅读更多关于 Is Perl a compiled or an interpreted programming language?

Is Perl compiled or interpreted? Prof. Falken Well, that depends on what you mean by a compiled language. Maybe this is why googling did not bring forth a clear answer to your question. One viewpoint is that compilation means compiling from a source code description to another, i.e. code generation . If we accept these premises, then Perl 6 can be compiled and Perl 5 and older are interpreted languages. Perl 6 is specifically compiled to Parrot bytecode . Perl 6 is therefore a properly compiled language, in the same way say, Java is . Perl 5 and older parses the Perl source code to an internal

Is Clojure compiled or interpreted?

阅读更多关于 Is Clojure compiled or interpreted?

问题 I read somewhere Clojure is compiled. Is it really compiled, like Java or Scala, rather than interpreted, like Jython or JRuby? 回答1: Clojure is always compiled . The Clojure compiler produces Java byte code, which is typically then JIT-compiled to native code by the JVM. The thing that can be confusing is the dynamic and interactive nature of Clojure that means you can invoke the compiler at run-time if you want to. This is all part of the Lisp "code is data" tradition. For example, the

Is Perl a compiled or an interpreted programming language?

阅读更多关于 Is Perl a compiled or an interpreted programming language?

问题 Is Perl compiled or interpreted? 回答1: Well, that depends on what you mean by a compiled language. Maybe this is why googling did not bring forth a clear answer to your question. One viewpoint is that compilation means compiling from a source code description to another, i.e. code generation. If we accept these premises, then Perl 6 can be compiled and Perl 5 and older are interpreted languages. Perl 6 is specifically compiled to Parrot bytecode. Perl 6 is therefore a properly compiled

Is Ruby really an interpreted language if all of its implementations are compiled into bytecode?

阅读更多关于 Is Ruby really an interpreted language if all of its implementations are compiled into bytecode?

In the chosen answer for this question about Blue Ruby , Chuck says: All of the current Ruby implementations are compiled to bytecode. Contrary to SAP's claims, as of Ruby 1.9, MRI itself includes a bytecode compiler, though the ability to save the compiled bytecode to disk disappeared somewhere in the process of merging the YARV virtual machine. JRuby is compiled into Java .class files. I don't have a lot of details on MagLev, but it seems safe to say it will take that road as well. I'm confused about this compilation/interpretation issue with respect to Ruby. I learned that Ruby is an

Is Ruby really an interpreted language if all of its implementations are compiled into bytecode?

阅读更多关于 Is Ruby really an interpreted language if all of its implementations are compiled into bytecode?

问题 In the chosen answer for this question about Blue Ruby, Chuck says: All of the current Ruby implementations are compiled to bytecode. Contrary to SAP's claims, as of Ruby 1.9, MRI itself includes a bytecode compiler, though the ability to save the compiled bytecode to disk disappeared somewhere in the process of merging the YARV virtual machine. JRuby is compiled into Java .class files. I don't have a lot of details on MagLev, but it seems safe to say it will take that road as well. I'm