caching

问题 So I'm using sass to update my Django site and I am using git to version the whole thing. I recently made an update to CSS file that had some bad errors in it. Sass compiled the changes and I pushed the new version to the server. I have looked on the server and the new css file is in fact there and reflects the changes, however when I look at our site the css file is being referenced as a cached file: "/static/CACHE/css/35ed7f45f0e3.css" Unfortunatley this cached version still has the errors

问题 So I'm using sass to update my Django site and I am using git to version the whole thing. I recently made an update to CSS file that had some bad errors in it. Sass compiled the changes and I pushed the new version to the server. I have looked on the server and the new css file is in fact there and reflects the changes, however when I look at our site the css file is being referenced as a cached file: "/static/CACHE/css/35ed7f45f0e3.css" Unfortunatley this cached version still has the errors

问题 Instead of passing lots of arguments to a kernel, I use a __constant__ variable. This variable is an array of structures which contains many pointers to data in global (these pointer would be a list of arguments); an array for the multiple different datasets to call a kernel on. Then the kernel accesses this array and dereferences to global the appropriate data. My question is, does this data get cached through L2 or the constant cache? Moreover, if the latter and, if loaded via __ldg() ,

问题 I want to cache npm dependencies so that I does not do npm install every time I push and instead just load it from cache. I think github action support this now?: How do I cache steps in GitHub actions? Here are few cases If package.json changes, which means yarn.lock or package-lock.json changed so do npm install and update cache Extending my above point, the contributor could be doing both yarn install and npm install From the same above question, I changed my github action to something

问题 I want to cache npm dependencies so that I does not do npm install every time I push and instead just load it from cache. I think github action support this now?: How do I cache steps in GitHub actions? Here are few cases If package.json changes, which means yarn.lock or package-lock.json changed so do npm install and update cache Extending my above point, the contributor could be doing both yarn install and npm install From the same above question, I changed my github action to something

问题 Suppose I have a list of url's like so : [ '/images/1', '/images/2', ... ] And I want to prefetch n of those so that transitioning between images is faster. What I am doing now in componentWillMount is the following: componentWillMount() { const { props } = this; const { prefetchLimit = 1, document = dummyDocument, imgNodes } = props; const { images } = document; const toPrefecth = take(prefetchLimit, images); const merged = zip(toPrefecth, imgNodes); merged.forEach(([url, node]) => { node

问题 Suppose I have a list of url's like so : [ '/images/1', '/images/2', ... ] And I want to prefetch n of those so that transitioning between images is faster. What I am doing now in componentWillMount is the following: componentWillMount() { const { props } = this; const { prefetchLimit = 1, document = dummyDocument, imgNodes } = props; const { images } = document; const toPrefecth = take(prefetchLimit, images); const merged = zip(toPrefecth, imgNodes); merged.forEach(([url, node]) => { node

问题 Suppose I have a list of url's like so : [ '/images/1', '/images/2', ... ] And I want to prefetch n of those so that transitioning between images is faster. What I am doing now in componentWillMount is the following: componentWillMount() { const { props } = this; const { prefetchLimit = 1, document = dummyDocument, imgNodes } = props; const { images } = document; const toPrefecth = take(prefetchLimit, images); const merged = zip(toPrefecth, imgNodes); merged.forEach(([url, node]) => { node

问题 I've been reading Ulrich Drepper's, "What every programmer should know about memory" and in section 3.3.2 Measurements of Cache Effects ( halfway down the page ) it gives me the impression that accessing any member of a struct causes the whole struct to get pulled into the CPU cache. Is this correct? If so, how does the hardware know about the layout of these structs? Or does the code generated by the compiler somehow force the entire struct to be loaded? Or are the slowdowns from using

问题 I've been reading Ulrich Drepper's, "What every programmer should know about memory" and in section 3.3.2 Measurements of Cache Effects ( halfway down the page ) it gives me the impression that accessing any member of a struct causes the whole struct to get pulled into the CPU cache. Is this correct? If so, how does the hardware know about the layout of these structs? Or does the code generated by the compiler somehow force the entire struct to be loaded? Or are the slowdowns from using