build

问题 I am currently on the way to deploy a java application with Docker and K8s. As I am using a Raspberry Pi Kubernetes Cluster I want to generate two images, one for the x86 plattform, and one for the arm32v7 (for testing on the Raspberry cluster). The goal is to generate two differently tagged docker images with one Dockerfile and push the resulting images to Docker Hub. I use the following Dockerfile. FROM openjdk:8-alpine as x86 RUN mkdir -p /usr/src/app COPY project/generated/distributions

问题 In the process of solving this tricky build situation, I have now encountered a problem with depending on a Cabal package that I generate myself (the full package, package.yaml and Setup.hs and source code and dependant C libraries and all). I have a stack.yaml and a package.yaml which together describe an environment where I can run my code generator, so this works: Set up the environment, make sure all dependencies are available: stack build In this environment, I can now execute a build

问题 Our Ember application is developed in 2.8 version and we follow POD structure. We are generating two different builds as below 1) For our dev server : No change in code,just do build 2) For our test server: Delete a section in HBS and also remove a route from router.js then do build And we take build using " npm run-scripts build " which is configured in our package.json as below "scripts": { "build": "ember build", "start": "ember server", "test" : "ember test" }, I would like to know in

问题 Our Ember application is developed in 2.8 version and we follow POD structure. We are generating two different builds as below 1) For our dev server : No change in code,just do build 2) For our test server: Delete a section in HBS and also remove a route from router.js then do build And we take build using " npm run-scripts build " which is configured in our package.json as below "scripts": { "build": "ember build", "start": "ember server", "test" : "ember test" }, I would like to know in

问题 I am looking to build a library and I need to pass two defines to that build, but cmake's target_compile_definitions() scrambles them in a manner that renders them unusable. The two defines are: -D'_LIB_EXCEPTION_ABI=__attribute__((visibility("default")))' -D'_LIB_FALLTHROUGH()=((void)0)' Unfortunately, the first one gets translated to (in the command build line): -D'_LIB_EXCEPTION_ABI="\__attribute__((visibility(\"default\")))'" While the second one is missing altogether from the command

问题 I would like to basically achive the very same thing you could achive while using the built in "tag-functionality" for build in Azure DevOps, with one exception.. I need to add a tag conditionally.. The basic idea is to evanluate if the SourceBranch for my PR starts with refs/heads/hotfix, and that the target branch is refs/heads/master, then I would like to tag the final merged commit with the tag "hotfix". I started with something like this: name: PR-$(Rev:r) trigger: none pool: vmImage:

问题 I have a Spring boot application which is managed by Gradle. What is done so far: Created application.yaml , application-dev.yaml , and application-qa.yaml files Mentioned spring: profiles: active: dev in application.yaml (default profile should be dev if none is mentioned) What need to be done: Need to build war with profile mentioned or passed while building. Example, for QA build, spring: profiles: active: should have value qa , so that it can pick-up application-qa.yaml properties. If no

问题 I have a Spring boot application which is managed by Gradle. What is done so far: Created application.yaml , application-dev.yaml , and application-qa.yaml files Mentioned spring: profiles: active: dev in application.yaml (default profile should be dev if none is mentioned) What need to be done: Need to build war with profile mentioned or passed while building. Example, for QA build, spring: profiles: active: should have value qa , so that it can pick-up application-qa.yaml properties. If no

问题 I'm building an R package under Windows 10 with RStudio 1.0.136 and get a warning about qpdf (see How to build qpdf on Windows? for more details about this issue). But and the end of the checks, the number of warnings is shown to be 0. So I wonder if there is one or no warning that has to be solved before I can submit the package to CRAN? Here is the last part of the checks: ... checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK WARNING 'qpdf' is needed for checks on size reduction of PDFs

问题 I'm building an R package under Windows 10 with RStudio 1.0.136 and get a warning about qpdf (see How to build qpdf on Windows? for more details about this issue). But and the end of the checks, the number of warnings is shown to be 0. So I wonder if there is one or no warning that has to be solved before I can submit the package to CRAN? Here is the last part of the checks: ... checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK WARNING 'qpdf' is needed for checks on size reduction of PDFs