bit-shift

Verilog Barrel Shifter

非 Y 不嫁゛ 提交于 2019-12-17 19:51:55
问题 I want to create a 64-bit barrel shifter in verilog (rotate right for now). I want to know if there is a way to do it without writing a 65 part case statement? Is there a way to write some simple code such as: Y = {S[i - 1:0], S[63:i]}; I tried the code above in Xilinx and get an error: i is not a constant. Main Question: Is there a way to do this without a huge case statment? 回答1: I've simplified some of the rules for clarity, but here are the details. In the statement Y = {S[i - 1:0], S[63

Is Shifting more than 32 bits of a uint64_t integer on an x86 machine Undefined Behavior?

送分小仙女□ 提交于 2019-12-17 19:39:00
问题 Learning the hard way, I tried to left shift a long long and uint64_t to more than 32 bits on an x86 machine resulted 0 . I vaguely remember to have read somewhere than on a 32 bit machine shift operators only work on the first 32 bits but cannot recollect the source. I would like to know is if Shifting more than 32 bits of a uint64_t integer on an x86 machine is an Undefined Behavior? 回答1: The standard says (6.5.7 in n1570): 3 The integer promotions are performed on each of the operands. The

Why is (-1 >>> 32) = -1? [duplicate]

微笑、不失礼 提交于 2019-12-17 19:22:17
问题 This question already has answers here : Closed 8 years ago . Possible Duplicate: why is 1>>32 == 1? -1 as an int converted to binary is represented by 32 1's. When I right-shift it 31 times, I get 1 (31 0's and one 1). But when I right-shift it 32 times, I get -1 again. Shouldn't it be equal to 0? 回答1: The Java specification explains the shift operators as follows: If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is int , only the five lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the

Need help understanding “getbits()” method in Chapter 2 of K&R C

∥☆過路亽.° 提交于 2019-12-17 15:25:26
问题 In chapter 2, the section on bitwise operators (section 2.9), I'm having trouble understanding how one of the sample methods works. Here's the method provided: unsigned int getbits(unsigned int x, int p, int n) { return (x >> (p + 1 - n)) & ~(~0 << n); } The idea is that, for the given number x , it will return the n bits starting at position p , counting from the right (with the farthest right bit being position 0). Given the following main() method: int main(void) { int x = 0xF994, p = 4, n

Weird result of Java Integer left shift

ⅰ亾dé卋堺 提交于 2019-12-17 13:00:31
问题 I'm a little confused now by java left shift operation, 1<<31 = 0x80000000 --> this I can understand But 1<<32 = 1 Why is this? 1<<33 = 2 Looks like more shifting values, modulus 32 of the value is taken. Thanks everybody for the replying and giving the quote from JLS. I just want to know more. Any idea of the reason why it's designed in this way? Or is it just some convention? Apparently C doesn't have this quirk? Thanks to @paxdiablo. Looks like C declares this behaviour undefined. I have

Arithmetic right shift gives bogus result?

只谈情不闲聊 提交于 2019-12-17 07:32:24
问题 I must be absolutely crazy here, but gcc 4.7.3 on my machine is giving the most absurd result. Here is the exact code that I'm testing: #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main(){ unsigned int b = 100000; cout << (b>>b) << endl; b = b >> b; cout << b << endl; b >>= b; cout << b << endl; return 0; } Now, any number that's right shifted by itself should result in 0 ( n/(2^n) == 0 with integer divide , n>1 , and positive/unsigned ), but somehow here is my output: 100000 100000 100000 Am

Why was 1 << 31 changed to be implementation-defined in C++14?

谁说我不能喝 提交于 2019-12-17 07:23:50
问题 In all versions of C and C++ prior to 2014, writing 1 << (CHAR_BIT * sizeof(int) - 1) caused undefined behaviour, because left-shifting is defined as being equivalent to successive multiplication by 2 , and this shift causes signed integer overflow: The result of E1 << E2 is E1 left-shifted E2 bit positions; vacated bits are filled with zeros. [...] If E1 has a signed type and nonnegative value, and E1 × 2 E2 is representable in the result type, then that is the resulting value; otherwise,

Java “Bit Shifting” Tutorial? [closed]

五迷三道 提交于 2019-12-17 04:25:54
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 5 years ago . I would be thankful for a good tutorial, that explain for java newbies how in java all the "bit shifting" work. I always stumble across it, but never understood how it works. It should explain all the operations and concepts that are possible with byteshifting/bitmanipulation in java. This is just an example

UNDERSTANDING how to count trailing zeros for a number using bitwise operators in C

好久不见. 提交于 2019-12-14 03:36:56
问题 Note - This is NOT a duplicate of this question - Count the consecutive zero bits (trailing) on the right in parallel: an explanation? . The linked question has a different context, it only asks the purpose of signed() being use. DO NOT mark this question as duplicate. I've been finding a way to acquire the number of trailing zeros in a number. I found a bit twiddling Stanford University Write up HERE here that gives the following explanation. unsigned int v; // 32-bit word input to count

Shift Right Logical from just ADD and NAND?

故事扮演 提交于 2019-12-13 21:20:59
问题 I'm making a multiplier in a very simple assembly language in which I have BEQ, NAND, and ADD to create a SRL. I also have to keep the multiplier under 50 lines (16 used thus far) so hopefully the solution can be thrown in a loop. EDIT: My question is how can I implement an SRL with just a NAND and an ADD Had an idea although it is very inefficient, maybe someone can improve it: Decrement say, a, by 1. Store that value in b. Add b and b and store in c. Beq c with a, if it's true then b is