authz | 易学教程

Keycloak uma-grant type tickets for service accounts do not seem to work with policies

阅读更多关于 Keycloak uma-grant type tickets for service accounts do not seem to work with policies

问题 I am trying to use the Keycloak AuthzClient to register resources and related permissions in a resource server. I have a resource server "resourceserver" with authz service enabled. Using the AuthzClient, initialized with the json file containing the resource server's client id and secret, I'm able to obtain a pat. ... authzClient.obtainAccessToken().getToken(); ResourceRepresentation resource = new ResourceRepresentation(); resource.setName("myresource"); resource.setUris(new HashSet<>

Keycloak uma-grant type tickets for service accounts do not seem to work with policies

阅读更多关于 Keycloak uma-grant type tickets for service accounts do not seem to work with policies

windos 2012 r2 security event log custom insert

阅读更多关于 windos 2012 r2 security event log custom insert

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63738071/windos-2012-r2-security-event-log-custom-insert

windos 2012 r2 security event log custom insert

阅读更多关于 windos 2012 r2 security event log custom insert

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63738071/windos-2012-r2-security-event-log-custom-insert

Can I use the JWSCL to check whether the current user has a specific extended right on an Active Directory object?

阅读更多关于 Can I use the JWSCL to check whether the current user has a specific extended right on an Active Directory object?

问题 [This is a slightly more specific version of the question I already asked here: How do I query effective permissions on an Active Directory Object? - Hopefully the answers I receive here will help me better understand and judge the answer(s) I received there.] Very specifically, I'm currently looking for a way to verify whether the current user has the Exchange-specific "Send As" permission (this is a so-called "extended right") on a given Active Directory object such as another user (i.e. a

SVN Restrict File Access using Wildcards

阅读更多关于 SVN Restrict File Access using Wildcards

问题 I took over as software lead on a project and am now managing the SVN repository for said project. Access to different parts are being controlled with an authz file. Groups have been set up for developers, leads, testers and cm control. A file exists in multiple branches and tags that we want to limit access to. In order to lock it down, I want no read or write access except to the leads group. Is there a way to do this without listing out each branch/tag area where it could be? I don't want

SVN Restrict File Access using Wildcards

阅读更多关于 SVN Restrict File Access using Wildcards

I took over as software lead on a project and am now managing the SVN repository for said project. Access to different parts are being controlled with an authz file. Groups have been set up for developers, leads, testers and cm control. A file exists in multiple branches and tags that we want to limit access to. In order to lock it down, I want no read or write access except to the leads group. Is there a way to do this without listing out each branch/tag area where it could be? I don't want anyone to go find it in an old revision if possible. An exmaple of my authz file is here: ### Groups

SVN Rights Management Tool using Windows Authentication method

阅读更多关于 SVN Rights Management Tool using Windows Authentication method

We're using VisualSVN Server as SVN server in Windows. But it has very limited abilities for managing rights. Also we couldn't use svn_access_file because our users are going to be authenticated using Windows Authentication method. Is there any tool to manage rights that uses/supports Windows Authentication? Lazy Badger it has very limited abilities for managing rights It has all abilities, that Subversion has per se. we couldn't use svn_access_file You can and must really, because Windows Authentication define only method of authentication, svn_access_file is authorization file and can refer

Fiware AuthZForce error: “AZF domain not created for application”

阅读更多关于 Fiware AuthZForce error: “AZF domain not created for application”

I'm trying to protect Orion Context Broker using KeyRock idm, Wilma PEP-Proxy and AuthZForce PDP over Docker. For now, level 1 security works well and I can deny access to non logged users, but I get this error on Wilma when trying to add level 2. AZF domain not created for application <applicationID> Here it is my azf configuration in Wilma's config.js file: config.azf = { enabled: true, protocol: 'http', host: 'azfcontainer', port: 8080, custom_policy: undefined }; And this is how I set the access control configuration on KeyRock: # ACCESS CONTROL GE ACCESS_CONTROL_URL = 'http://azfcontainer

“AZF domain not created for application” AuthZforce

阅读更多关于 “AZF domain not created for application” AuthZforce

问题 I have an application that uses the KeyRock, PEP, PDP(AuthZForce). The security level 1 (authentication) with Keyrock and PEP are working, but when we try to use AuthZForce to check the authorization, I get the error message: AZF domain not created for application I have my user and my application that I created following the steps on the Fiware IdM User and Programmers Guide. I am also able to create domains as stated in the AuthZForce - Installation and Administration Guide but I don't know