accumulator

python accumulating while loop keeps repeating what did i do wrong?

亡梦爱人 提交于 2019-12-02 16:27:22
问题 I can't figure out what I am doing wrong. I have tried using a break, and tried setting what the variable !=, I am doing this on cengage and it is very finnicky. """ LeftOrRight.py - This program calculates the total number of left-handed and right-handed students in a class. Input: L for left-handed; R for right handed; X to quit. Output: Prints the number of left-handed students and the number of right-handed students.""" rightTotal = 0 # Number of right-handed students. leftTotal = 0 #

Spark : Difference between accumulator and local variable

穿精又带淫゛_ 提交于 2019-12-01 14:29:06
While exploring Spark accumulators, I tried to understand and showcase the difference between the accumulator and regular variable in Spark. But output does not seem to match my expectation. I mean both the accumulator and counter have the same value at the end of program and am able read accumulator within transformation function (as per docs only driver can read accumulator). Am i doing something wrong? Is my understanding correct? object Accmulators extends App { val spark = SparkSession.builder().appName("Accmulators").master("local[3]").getOrCreate() val cntAccum = spark.sparkContext

Spark : Difference between accumulator and local variable

女生的网名这么多〃 提交于 2019-12-01 12:51:44
问题 While exploring Spark accumulators, I tried to understand and showcase the difference between the accumulator and regular variable in Spark. But output does not seem to match my expectation. I mean both the accumulator and counter have the same value at the end of program and am able read accumulator within transformation function (as per docs only driver can read accumulator). Am i doing something wrong? Is my understanding correct? object Accmulators extends App { val spark = SparkSession

Why does the mov instruction have use ax instead of two segment registers directly?

陌路散爱 提交于 2019-12-01 05:19:41
I see code like: mov ax, cs mov ds, ax mov es, ax Why can't I just compress this to: mov ds, cs mov es, cs Is the first way faster since its using the accumulator register? But that wouldn't seem intuitive since cs and ds are segment registers . Or is there some restriction that I'm unaware of? I'm using nasm by the way. You can't mov segment register to segment register -- there's no instruction for it. There is only so much room in a processor for the microcode for all its instructions. So one general instruction is often preferred over several special purpose ones for rarely uused

Why does the mov instruction have use ax instead of two segment registers directly?

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-12-01 03:06:02
问题 I see code like: mov ax, cs mov ds, ax mov es, ax Why can't I just compress this to: mov ds, cs mov es, cs Is the first way faster since its using the accumulator register? But that wouldn't seem intuitive since cs and ds are segment registers . Or is there some restriction that I'm unaware of? I'm using nasm by the way. 回答1: You can't mov segment register to segment register -- there's no instruction for it. 回答2: There is only so much room in a processor for the microcode for all its

Is there a MATLAB accumarray equivalent in numpy?

孤街浪徒 提交于 2019-11-30 17:28:35
I'm looking for a fast solution to MATLAB's accumarray in numpy. The accumarray accumulates the elements of an array which belong to the same index. An example: a = np.arange(1,11) # array([ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]) accmap = np.array([0,1,0,0,0,1,1,2,2,1]) Result should be array([13, 25, 17]) What I've done so far: I've tried the accum function in the recipe here which works fine but is slow. accmap = np.repeat(np.arange(1000), 20) a = np.random.randn(accmap.size) %timeit accum(accmap, a, np.sum) # 1 loops, best of 3: 293 ms per loop Then I tried to use the solution here which is

Is it possible to use boost accumulators with vectors?

佐手、 提交于 2019-11-29 01:36:37
I wanted to use boost accumulators to calculate statistics of a variable that is a vector. Is there a simple way to do this. I think it's not possible to use the dumbest thing: using namespace boost::accumulators; //stuff... accumulator_set<vector<double>, stats<tag::mean> > acc; vector<double> some_vetor; //stuff some_vector = doStuff(); acc(some_vector); maybe this is obvious, but I tried anyway. :P What I wanted was to have an accumulator that would calculate a vector which is the mean of the components of many vectors. Is there an easy way out? EDIT: I don't know if I was thoroughly clear.

SQLite: accumulator (sum) column in a SELECT statement

佐手、 提交于 2019-11-29 01:24:07
问题 I have a table like this one: SELECT value FROM table; value 1 3 13 1 5 I would like to add an accumulator column, so that I have this result: value accumulated 1 1 3 4 13 17 1 18 5 23 How can I do this? What's the real name of what I want to do? Thanks 回答1: try this way: select value, (select sum(t2.value) from table t2 where t2.id <= t1.id ) as accumulated from table t1 but if it will not work on your database, just add order by something select value, (select sum(t2.value) from table t2

Is the accumulator of reduce in Java 8 allowed to modify its arguments?

牧云@^-^@ 提交于 2019-11-28 08:23:31
In Java 8, Stream has a method reduce: T reduce(T identity, BinaryOperator<T> accumulator); Is the accumulator operator allowed to modify either of its arguments? I presume not since the JavaDoc says the accumulator should be NonInterfering, though all examples talk of modifying the collection, rather than modifying the elements of the collection. So, for a concrete example, if we have integers.reduce(0, Integer::sum); and suppose for a moment that Integer was mutable, would sum be allowed to modify its first parameter by adding to it (in place) the value of its second parameter? I presume not

Is it possible to use boost accumulators with vectors?

别来无恙 提交于 2019-11-27 16:10:44
问题 I wanted to use boost accumulators to calculate statistics of a variable that is a vector. Is there a simple way to do this. I think it's not possible to use the dumbest thing: using namespace boost::accumulators; //stuff... accumulator_set<vector<double>, stats<tag::mean> > acc; vector<double> some_vetor; //stuff some_vector = doStuff(); acc(some_vector); maybe this is obvious, but I tried anyway. :P What I wanted was to have an accumulator that would calculate a vector which is the mean of