Is it a bad idea to reload routes dynamically in Rails?

后端 未结 4 615
萌比男神i
萌比男神i 2021-02-03 13:43

I have an application I\'m writing where I\'m allowing the administrators to add aliases for pages, categories, etc, and I would like to use a different controller/action depend

相关标签:
4条回答
  • 2021-02-03 13:59

    Ben,

    I find the method you're already using to be the best. Using Rails 3, you'd have to change the code a bit, to:

    MyNewApplication::Application.reload_routes!
    

    That's all.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-03 14:09

    First, as other have suggested, create a catch-all route at the bottom of routes.rb:

    map.connect ':name', :controller => 'aliases', :action => 'show'
    

    Then, in AliasesController, you can use render_component to render the aliased action:

    class AliasesController < ApplicationController
      def show
        if alias = Alias.find_by_name(params[:name])
          render_component(:controller => alias.page_type.controller, 
                            :action => alias.page_type.action,
                            :navigation_node_id => alias.navigation_node.id)
        else
          render :file => "#{RAILS_ROOT}/public/404.html", :status => :not_found
        end
      end
    end
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-03 14:11

    Quick Solution

    Have a catch-all route at the bottom of routes.rb. Implement any alias lookup logic you want in the action that route routes you to.

    In my implementation, I have a table which maps defined URLs to a controller, action, and parameter hash. I just pluck them out of the database, then call the appropriate action and then try to render the default template for the action. If the action already rendered something, that throws a DoubleRenderError, which I catch and ignore.

    You can extend this technique to be as complicated as you want, although as it gets more complicated it makes more sense to implement it by tweaking either your routes or the Rails default routing logic rather than by essentially reimplementing all the routing logic yourself.

    If you don't find an alias, you can throw the 404 or 500 error as you deem appropriate.

    Stuff to keep in mind:

    Caching: Not knowing your URLs a priori can make page caching an absolute bear. Remember, it caches based on the URI supplied, NOT on the url_for (:action_you_actually_executed). This means that if you alias

    /foo_action/bar_method
    

    to

    /some-wonderful-alias
    

    you'll get some-wonderful-alias.html living in your cache directory. And when you try to sweep foo's bar, you won't sweep that file unless you specify it explicitly.

    Fault Tolerance: Check to make sure someone doesn't accidentally alias over an existing route. You can do this trivially by forcing all aliases into a "directory" which is known to not otherwise be routable (in which case, the alias being textually unique is enough to make sure they never collide), but that isn't a maximally desirable solution for a few of the applications I can think of of this.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-03 14:19

    I'm not sure I fully understand the question, but you could use method_missing in your controllers and then lookup the alias, maybe like this:

    class MyController
      def method_missing(sym, *args)
        aliased = Alias.find_by_action_name(sym)
        # sanity check here in case no alias
    
        self.send( aliased.real_action_name )
        # sanity check here in case the real action calls a different render explicitly
        render :action => aliased.real_action_name
      end
    
      def normal_action
        @thing = Things.find(params[:id])
      end
    end
    

    If you wanted to optimize that, you could put a define_method in the method_missing, so it would only be 'missing' on the first invocation, and would be a normal method from then on.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题