Why doesn\'t the graph in Sourcetree display a new branch branching off from the master branch , when I create a new branch called \"testing123\" in terminal ?
Sourcetre
It does: it has one new commit done from master
.
That means you have checked out the new branch testing123
, done one commit and pushed it (hence origin/testing123
).
You don't see any "branching" because there is no new commit on master
since testing123
has been created: the history of testing123
remains "linear" with the one of master
.
Once a new commit will have been created on master
, you will see a fork.
See also this thread on SourceTree:
2 possible reasons for this:
- You have 'Current Branch' selected at the top of the log view, or
- The branches didn't actually cause a divergence in the graph.
A branch is just a marker, unless different commits actually occurred in each that were not shared between then, there won't be a fork in the graph.
This is actually a genuine issue if the purpose of GitFlow is to be intuitively informative. If I do an initial commit followed by branch develop, and branch feature1 (as in Vincent Dreissen's A Successful Git-Branching Model) GitFlow depicts this as a linear chain o-o-o when in fact it should be a branching chain
o [feature1]
/
o [develop]
/
o [master]
with links in different colors, blue pink, and yellow, to indicate that these are three separate branches. Now GitFlow does "fix" this problem when you eventually merge develop and feature, and then merge master and develop, but until you do those merges the graph looks much different than what you are conceptualizing.
Can there be an option to make different branches appear in different colors? Because the original questioner's point is right - the master and test123 branches appear in a single line of a single color. That is actually not quite right, and is very confusing to the noobie.