I have some trouble with loading a pickled file in a module that is different from the module where I pickled the file. I am aware of the following thread: Unable to load files
in your class_def.py
file you have this code:
if __name__ == '__main__':
doc = Document()
utils.save_document(doc)
This means that doc
will be a __main__.Document
object, so when it is pickled it is expecting to be able to get a Document
class from the main module, to fix this you need to use the definition of Document
from a module called class_def
meaning you would add an import here:
(in general you can just do from <own module name> import *
right inside the if __name__ == "__main__"
)
if __name__ == '__main__':
from class_def import Document
# ^ so that it is using the Document class defined under the class_def module
doc = Document()
utils.save_document(doc)
that way it will need to run the class_def.py file twice, once as __main__
and once as class_def
but it does mean that the data will be pickled as a class_def.Document
object so loading it will retrieve the class from the correct place. Otherwise if you have a way of constructing one document object from another you can do something like this in utils.py
:
def save_document(doc):
if doc.__class__.__module__ == "__main__":
from class_def import Document #get the class from the reference-able module
doc = Document(doc) #convert it to the class we are able to use
write_file = open(file_path, 'wb')
pickle.dump(doc, write_file)
Although usually I'd prefer the first way.
I had a similar problem and only just realized the differences between our implementations.
Your file structure:
My mistake (using your file names) was first:
What solved my pickle import problem:
This had the welcomed side effect that I didn't need to import the util_and_class file as it's baked into the pickle file. Calling the instance and saving the pickle in a separate file resolved the __name__
issue of "loading a pickled file in a module that is different from the module where I pickled the file."