I have a main thread that waits for connection. It spawns client threads that will echo the response from the client (telnet in this case). But say that I want to close down all
I found a solution using timeouts. That will interrupt the recv (actually before the timeout has expired which is nice):
# Echo server program
import socket
from threading import Thread
import time
class ClientThread(Thread):
def __init__(self, clientSocke):
Thread.__init__(self)
self.clientSocket = clientSocket
def run(self):
while 1:
try:
data = self.clientSocket.recv(1024)
print "Got data: ", data
self.clientSocket.send(data)
except socket.timeout:
# If it was a timeout, we want to continue with recv
continue
except:
break
self.clientSocket.close()
HOST = ''
PORT = 6000
serverSocket = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
serverSocket.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)
serverSocket.bind((HOST, PORT))
serverSocket.listen(1)
clientSocket, addr = serverSocket.accept()
clientSocket.settimeout(1)
print 'Got a new connection from: ', addr
clientThread = ClientThread(clientSocket)
clientThread.start()
# Close it down immediatly
clientSocket.close()
I must apologize for the comments below. The earlier comment by @Matt Anderson works. I had made a mistake when trying it out which led to my post below.
Using timeout is not a very good solution. It may seem that waking up for an instant and then going back to sleep is no big deal, but I have seen it greatly affect the performance of an application. You have an operation that for the most part wants to block until data is available and thus sleep forever. However, if you want to abort for some reason, like shutting down your application, then the trick is how to get out. For sockets, you can use select and listen on two sockets. Your primary one, and a special shutdown one. Creating the shutdown one though is a bit of a pain. You have to create it. You have to get the listening socket to accept it. You have to keep track of both ends of this pipe. I have the same issue with the Synchronized Queue class. There however, you can at least insert a dummy object into the queue to wake up the get(). This requires that the dummy object not look like your normal data though. I sometimes wish Python had something like the Windows API WaitForMultipleObjects.
I know this is an old thread and that Samuel probably fixed his issue a long time ago. However, I had the same problem and came across this post while google'ing. Found a solution and think it is worthwhile to add.
You can use the shutdown method on the socket class. It can prevent further sends, receives or both.
socket.shutdown(socket.SHUT_WR)
The above prevents future sends, as an example.
See Python docs for more info.
I don't know if it's possible to do what you're asking, but it shouldn't be necessary. Just don't read from the socket if there is nothing to read; use select.select
to check the socket for data.
change:
data = self.clientSocket.recv(1024)
print "Got data: ", data
self.clientSocket.send(data)
to something more like this:
r, _, _ = select.select([self.clientSocket], [], [])
if r:
data = self.clientSocket.recv(1024)
print "Got data: ", data
self.clientSocket.send(data)
EDIT: If you want to guard against the possibility that the socket has been closed, catch socket.error
.
do_read = False
try:
r, _, _ = select.select([self.clientSocket], [], [])
do_read = bool(r)
except socket.error:
pass
if do_read:
data = self.clientSocket.recv(1024)
print "Got data: ", data
self.clientSocket.send(data)