Given that I have the following two vectors:
In [99]: time_index
Out[99]:
[1484942413,
1484942712,
1484943012,
1484943312,
1484943612,
1484943912,
1484944
Can you explain why np.gradient doesn't produce the same results as the first proposed answer. – Darthtrader May 5 at 9:58
np.gradient uses a 2nd order scheme while .diff() uses a 1st order scheme. This means that the results from np.gradient will be continuous as will the derivative. The results from .diff() do not have to have a continuous derivative. Essentially np.gradient gives 'smoother' results.
Or if you'd like to calculate the rate of change you can just use df.pct_change()
As a parameter you can enter df.pct_change(n)
, where n
is the lookback period assuming you have a datetime indexed dataframe.
A naive explanation would be that diff literally subtracts following entries while np.gradient uses a central difference scheme.
pd.Series.diff()
only takes the differences. It doesn't divide by the delta of the index as well.
This gets you the answer
recv.diff() / recv.index.to_series().diff().dt.total_seconds()
2017-01-20 20:00:00 NaN
2017-01-20 20:05:00 4521.493333
2017-01-20 20:10:00 4533.760000
2017-01-20 20:15:00 4557.493333
2017-01-20 20:20:00 4536.053333
2017-01-20 20:25:00 4567.813333
2017-01-20 20:30:00 4406.160000
2017-01-20 20:35:00 4366.720000
2017-01-20 20:40:00 4407.520000
2017-01-20 20:45:00 4421.173333
Freq: 300S, dtype: float64
You could also use numpy.gradient
passing the bytes_in
and the delta you expect to have. This will not reduce the length by one, instead making assumptions about the edges.
np.gradient(bytes_in, 300) * 8
array([ 4521.49333333, 4527.62666667, 4545.62666667, 4546.77333333,
4551.93333333, 4486.98666667, 4386.44 , 4387.12 ,
4414.34666667, 4421.17333333])
As there is no builtin derivative
method in Pandas Series / DataFrame you can use https://github.com/scls19fr/pandas-helper-calc.
It will provide a new accessor called calc
to Pandas Series and DataFrames to calculate numerically derivative and integral.
So you will be able to simply do
recv.calc.derivative()
It's using diff()
under the hood.