How to run binary file in Linux

前端 未结 11 1033
执念已碎
执念已碎 2021-02-01 18:15

I have a file called commanKT and want to run it in a Linux terminal. Can someone help by giving the command to run this file? I tried ./commonRT but I

相关标签:
11条回答
  • 2021-02-01 18:35

    full path for binary file. For example: /home/vitaliy2034/binary_file_name. Or use directive "./+binary_file_name". './' in unix system it return full path to directory, in which you open terminal(shell). I hope it helps. Sorry, for my english language)

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-01 18:37

    It is possible that you compiled your binary with incompatible architecture settings on your build host vs. your execution host. Can you please have a look at the enabled target settings via

    g++ {all-your-build-flags-here} -Q -v --help=target
    

    on your build host? In particular, the COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS variable may give you valuable debug info. Then have a look at the CPU capabilities on your execution host via

    cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -m1 flags
    

    Look out for mismatches such as -msse4.2 [enabled] on your build host but a missing sse4_2 flag in the CPU capabilities.

    If that doesn't help, please provide the output of ldd commonKT on both build and execution host.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-01 18:38

    The only way that works for me (extracted from here):

    chmod a+x name_of_file.bin
    

    Then run it by writing

    ./name_of_file.bin
    

    If you get a permission error you might have to launch your application with root privileges:

     sudo ./name_of_file.bin
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-01 18:41

    If it is not a typo, as pointed out earlier, it could be wrong compiler options like compiling 64 bit under 32 bit. It must not be a toolchain.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-01 18:43

    This is an answer to @craq :

    I just compiled the file from C source and set it to be executable with chmod. There were no warning or error messages from gcc.

    I'm a bit surprised that you had to 'set it to executable' -- my gcc always sets the executable flag itself. This suggests to me that gcc didn't expect this to be the final executable file, or that it didn't expect it to be executable on this system.

    Now I've tried to just create the object file, like so:

    $ gcc -c -o hello hello.c
    $ chmod +x hello
    

    (hello.c is a typical "Hello World" program.) But my error message is a bit different:

    $ ./hello
    bash: ./hello: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error`
    

    On the other hand, this way, the output of the file command is identical to yours:

    $ file hello
    hello: ELF 64-bit LSB  relocatable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), not stripped
    

    Whereas if I compile correctly, its output is much longer.

    $ gcc -o hello hello.c
    $ file hello
    hello: ELF 64-bit LSB  executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.24, BuildID[sha1]=131bb123a67dd3089d23d5aaaa65a79c4c6a0ef7, not stripped
    

    What I am saying is: I suspect it has something to do with the way you compile and link your code. Maybe you can shed some light on how you do that?

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题