standalone assertion libraries?

后端 未结 2 1872
暖寄归人
暖寄归人 2021-02-01 16:59

I was nearly through porting YUI assertion modules to standalone libraries when the thought popped into mind that I should have perhaps asked on StackOverflow if this was necess

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2021-02-01 17:57

    As of May 7, 2012

    After some brief research, starting with the most minimalistic:

    • assert.js - port of node assert functions
    • jShould - QUnit extension
    • should.js - node library
    • expect.js - based on should.js, standalone
    • YUIPort - YUI libs but standalone
    • chai - node and browser, plugins inc. for JQuery
    • expectThat - CoffeeScript

    I have to admit that I do tend to agree with a commenter on DailyJS:

    I don't understand why everyone likes these wordy assertion libraries.

    Although I'm not a CoffeeScript user, I do tend to gravitate towards the plain assert.js style syntax rather than all this chaining.

    Features that these libraries are developing include:

    • plugable with the major test suites (saves having to switch between two libraries when coding)
    • coding server-side (node) and client-side without changing libraries
    • integration into the main web frameworks (e.g. JQuery)

    Some of the major test suites include:

    • JQuery's QUnit
    • Mocha
    • Jasmine
    • js-test-driver
    • YUI Test
    • Sinon.JS

    The major web frameworks often include their own test suites.

    Logging wise, there is a discussion on libraries available. They don't, at a glance, seem to have caught up with server-side JS as of yet.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-01 18:03
    function assert(condition, message) {
        if (!condition) throw new Error(message)
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题