If I understand correctly, traits are the closest thing to Java interfaces and class constructors automatically set the variables.
But what if I have a class that extend
trait Foo { var foo: String = _ }
class Bar(foo0: String) extends Foo { foo = foo0 }
The trait declares an uninitialized var; the class then sets it equal to the input parameter.
Alternatively,
trait Foo {
def foo: String
def foo_=(s: String): Unit
}
class Bar(var foo: String) extends Foo {}
declares the getter/setter pair corresponding to a foo, which are set by the class.
Bar
must define the abstract var foo
in Foo
(would be the same for a val
). This can be done in the constructor
class Bar(var foo: String) extends Foo{...}
(of course, it could be done in the body of Bar
too). By default, constructor parameters will be turned to private val
if need be, that is if they are used outside the initiailization code, in methods. But you can force the behavior by marking them val
or var
, and possibly control the visibility as in
class X(protected val s: String, private var i: Int)
Here you need a public var
to implement Foo
.