Difference among always_ff, always_comb, always_latch and always

后端 未结 1 619
暗喜
暗喜 2021-01-31 17:28

I am totally confused among these 4 terms: always_ff, always_comb, always_latch and always. How and for what purpose can thes

相关标签:
1条回答
  • 2021-01-31 18:12

    always is the main type of process from Verilog, the other is an initial which is ran once at the start of a simulation.

    always_ff @(posedge clk) :
    Represents a flip-flop (ff), the process is triggered (executed) on every positive edge of the clock. This replaces always @(posedge clk). This is the only type where non-blocking (<=) assignments should be used, as this mimics the way a flip-flop transfers data.

    always_ff @(posedge clk) begin
      a <= b;
    end
    

    always_latch : is for representing latches.

    Usage would be :

    always_latch begin
      if (enable) begin
         a_latch = something;
      end
      //No else clause so a_latch's value
      //is not always defined, so it holds its value
    end
    

    This replaces :

    always @* begin
      if (enable) begin
         a_latch = something;
      end
      //No else clause so a_latch's value
      //is not always defined, so it holds its value
    end
    

    always_comb:
    Is for combinatorial logic, it is replacement for always @* when you do not want a latch. Now we can now differentiate our design intent between when we want and do not want latches.

    The SystemVerilog names always_ff, always_latch and always_comb have stricter criteria for when they are triggered, this means the chance for RTL to Gate level (post synthesis) mismatch is reduced. It does mean the are not 100% equivalent to there always @ counter part and may change some simulation behaviour.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题