What I\'m trying todo in a nutshell is I am using a background queue to save JSON objects pulled from a web service to the Core Data Sqlite3 database. The saving takes place on
in your case because your writing to the background moc the notification for mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification will come in on the background moc, not the foreground moc.
so you'll need to register for notifications on the background thread coming to the background moc object.
when you receive that call you can send a message to the main thread moc to mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification.
andrew
update: here's a sample that should work
//register for this on the background thread
NSNotificationCenter *nc = [NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter];
[nc addObserver:self selector:@selector(mergeChanges:) name:NSManagedObjectContextDidSaveNotification object:backgroundMOC];
- (void)mergeChanges:(NSNotification *)notification {
NSManagedObjectContext *mainThreadMOC = [singleton managedObjectContext];
//this tells the main thread moc to run on the main thread, and merge in the changes there
[mainThreadMOC performSelectorOnMainThread:@selector(mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification:) withObject:notification waitUntilDone:YES];
}
I'm going to throw this out there. Stop following the best practices for concurrency listed in the Core Data Programming Guide. Apple has not updated it since adding nested contexts which are MUCH easier to use. This video goes into full detail: https://developer.apple.com/videos/wwdc/2012/?id=214
Setup your primary context to use your main thread (appropriate for handling UI):
NSManagedObjectContext * context = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc] initWithConcurrencyType:NSMainQueueConcurrencyType];
[context setPersistentStoreCoordinator:yourPSC];
For any object you create that may be doing concurrent operations, create a private queue context to use
NSManagedObjectContext * backgroundContext = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc] initWithConcurrencyType:NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType];
[backgroundContext setParentContext:context];
//Use backgroundContext to insert/update...
//Then just save the context, it will automatically sync to your primary context
[backgroundContext save:nil];
The QueueConcurrencyType refers to the queue the context will do it's fetch (save and fetch request) operations on. The NSMainQueueConcurrencyType context does all it's work on the main queue, which makes it appropriate for UI interaction. A NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType does it on it's own private queue. So when you call save on the backgroundContext, it merges it's private data calling the parentContext using performBlock
as appropriate automatically. You don't want to call performBlock
on the private queue context in case it happens to be on the main thread which will cause a deadlock.
If you want to get really fancy, You can create a primary context as a private queue concurrency type (which is appropriate for background saving) with a main queue context for just your UI and then child contexts of your main queue context for background operations (like imports).
I see you've worked out an answer that works for you. But I have been having some similar issues and wanted to share my experience and see if it is at all helpful to you or others looking at this situation.
Multi-threaded Core Data stuff is always a little confusing to read, so please excuse me if I misread your code. But it appears that there could be a simpler answer for you.
The core issue you had in the first attempt is that you saved off managed object IDs (supposedly the object identifiers that can be passed between threads) to a global variable for use on the main thread. You did this on a background thread. The problem was that you did this BEFORE saving to the background thread's managed object context. Object IDs are not safe to pass to another thread/context pair prior to a save. They can change when you save. See the warning in the documentation of objectID: NSManagedObject reference
You fixed this by notifying your background thread of the save, and inside that thread, grabbing the now-safe-to-use-because-the-context-has-been-saved object IDs from the notification object. These were passed to the main thread, and the actual changes were also merged into the main thread with the call to mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification. Here's where you might save a step or two.
You are registering to hear the NSManagedObjectContextDidSaveNotification on the background thread. You can register to hear that same notification on the main thread instead. And in that notification you will have the same object IDs that are safe to use on the main thread. The main thread MOC can be safely updated using mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification and the passed notification object, since the method is designed to work this way: mergeChanges docs. Calling your completion block from either thread is now safe as long as you match the moc to the thread the completion block is called on.
So you can do all your main thread updating stuff on the main thread, cleanly separating the threads and avoiding having to pack and repack the updated stuff or doing a double save of the same changes to the persistent store.
To be clear - the Merge that happens is on the managed object contextand its in-memory state - the moc on the main thread is updated to match the one on the background thread, but a new save isn't necessary since you ALREADY saved these changes to the store on the background thread. You have thread safe access to any of those updated objects in the notification object, just as you did when you used it on the background thread.
I hope your solution is working for you and you don't have to re-factor - but wanted to add my thoughts for others who might see this. Please let me know if I've misinterpreted your code and I'll amend.