In Java or C# or some other languages, there are non-blocking IO facilities, e.g., for sockets.
So I can give my callback functions to the non-blocking IO and once the n
On Windows there is underlying OS support for non-blocking I/O, and Microsoft's CLR takes advantage of that. Other CLR implementations (mono) probably do as well, but I don't know for sure. When performing async I/O on the Microsoft CLR there is not a 1-to-1 correlation between pending async I/O operations and threads (or at least managed threads) waiting for those I/O operations to complete.
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365683(v=vs.85).aspx for some details on the Win32-layer details. Also the information on I/O completion ports here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365198(VS.85).aspx
My understanding is this:
Caveats to the above:
I am sure I got part of this wrong, but I believe the overall gist of it is correct. Eric or someone can come in and correct me where I'm off.
In .NET there are multiple I/O completion port threads. I have no idea how async I/O requests are allocated amongst the various I/O completion ports. This may be an operating system feature (wherein I/O may come back on any port that the application has open).
For Java I am sure it depends on the JVM implementation and the particular OS. I don't know it nearly well enough to speculate beyond that.
EDIT: Historical update, many more details here