I wish to know the relation between transactions and locks.
To be more specific, how is Spring\'s @Transactional
related to Hibernate\'s LockMode. https://d
There is no direct relationship between @Transactional
and @LockMode
annotations.
@Transactional is used to mark the explicit boundaries of a RESOURCE_LOCAL or JTA transaction. The reason why you need it is that every database statement executes in a transactional context, and, if you don't set the transaction boundaries, you'll get one transaction per statement or auto-commit.
On the other hand, @LockModeType
is for setting explicit locking options. If you don't set it, the implicit locking mechanisms will be used:
So, @LockModeType
is for setting locking options explicitly, and you can have the following options:
The PESSIMISTIC
lock modes will always acquire a database lock on the table row that is associated with the locked entity.
There are also explicit optimistic lock strategies:
The OPTIMISTIC
lock modes are meant to give you a way of bumping up an entity version even if the entity hasn't changed in the currently running Persistence Context. This is a very useful mechanism when you need to coordinate multiple child entities using their parent entity version.
There are lots of examples in the links that I provided in this answer, so take your time, read them all, and you'll understand all these concepts in greater detail.
Spring's @Transactional
and Hibernate's LockMode
class are different.
Spring Transaction Management
@Transactional
is a Spring annotation for declarative transaction management, i.e. defining what SQL statements are executed together inside of a database transaction. Using the readOnly
attribute allows Spring to throw an exception if you attempt to insert rows inside of a read-only transaction, for example.
With respect to locking, however, you'll most likely be using a read/write (readOnly = false
) transaction, because you'll be attempting to modify data.
Pessimistic Locking
Hibernate's LockMode
is used for pessimistic locking, e.g. LockMode.UPGRADE
actually executes a SELECT...FOR UPDATE
statement, and locks the row in the database corresponding to the entity.
Pessimistic locking assumes that concurrent transactions will conflict with each other, and requires resources to be locked after they are read and only unlocked after the application has finished using the data.
Optimistic Locking
Optimistic concurrency control in Hibernate typically uses a version or timestamp column in the database. The idea here is that if multiple transactions attempt to modify a row concurrently, all but the first committed transaction will detect that the version number has changed and perform a rollback.
Optimistic locking assumes that multiple transactions can complete without affecting each other, and that therefore transactions can proceed without locking the data resources that they affect. Before committing, each transaction verifies that no other transaction has modified its data. If the check reveals conflicting modifications, the committing transaction rolls back.
Quotes above are from: https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/4.0/devguide/en-US/html/ch05.html