How do Java, C++, C#, etc. get around this particular syntactic ambiguity with < and>?

Question

I used to think C++ was the \"weird\" one with all the ambiguities with < and >, but after trying to implement a parser I think I found an exampl

Answer 1

a generic method call in java would be <h,i>g(j) so there is no ambiguity :)

Answer 2

I just can't imagine any non-hacky/context-free way of dealing with this, and I'm baffled at how any such language can be context-free, let alone LALR(1)-parsable...

The answer is that they aren't (at least not Java and C++; I know very little about C#). The Java grammar that you link to dates back to 1996, way before generics have been introduced.

For further discussion, see Are C# and Java Grammars LALR(x)?