ObjectPool or similar for .NET already in a library?

Question

I don\'t want to write my own because i\'m afraid i might miss something and/or rip off other people\'s work, so is there an ObjectPool (or similar) class existing in a library

Answer 1

How about System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary?

Answer 2

UPDATE:

I'd also put forward BufferBlock<T> from TPL DataFlow. IIRC it's part of .net now. The great thing about BufferBlock<T> is that you can wait asynchronously for items to become available using the Post<T> and ReceiveAsync<T> extension methods. Pretty handy in an async/await world.

ORIGINAL ANSWER

A while back I faced this problem and came up with a lightweight (rough'n'ready) threadsafe (I hope) pool that has proved very useful, reusable and robust:

    public class Pool<T> where T : class
    {
        private readonly Queue<AsyncResult<T>> asyncQueue = new Queue<AsyncResult<T>>();
        private readonly Func<T> createFunction;
        private readonly HashSet<T> pool;
        private readonly Action<T> resetFunction;

        public Pool(Func<T> createFunction, Action<T> resetFunction, int poolCapacity)
        {
            this.createFunction = createFunction;
            this.resetFunction = resetFunction;
            pool = new HashSet<T>();
            CreatePoolItems(poolCapacity);
        }

        public Pool(Func<T> createFunction, int poolCapacity) : this(createFunction, null, poolCapacity)
        {
        }

        public int Count
        {
            get
            {
                return pool.Count;
            }
        }

        private void CreatePoolItems(int numItems)
        {
            for (var i = 0; i < numItems; i++)
            {
                var item = createFunction();
                pool.Add(item);
            }
        }

        public void Push(T item)
        {
            if (item == null)
            {
                Console.WriteLine("Push-ing null item. ERROR");
                throw new ArgumentNullException();
            }
            if (resetFunction != null)
            {
                resetFunction(item);
            }
            lock (asyncQueue)
            {
                if (asyncQueue.Count > 0)
                {
                    var result = asyncQueue.Dequeue();
                    result.SetAsCompletedAsync(item);
                    return;
                }
            }
            lock (pool)
            {
                pool.Add(item);
            }
        }

        public T Pop()
        {
            T item;
            lock (pool)
            {
                if (pool.Count == 0)
                {
                    return null;
                }
                item = pool.First();
                pool.Remove(item);
            }
            return item;
        }

        public IAsyncResult BeginPop(AsyncCallback callback)
        {
            var result = new AsyncResult<T>();
            result.AsyncCallback = callback;
            lock (pool)
            {
                if (pool.Count == 0)
                {
                    lock (asyncQueue)
                    {
                        asyncQueue.Enqueue(result);
                        return result;
                    }
                }
                var poppedItem = pool.First();
                pool.Remove(poppedItem);
                result.SetAsCompleted(poppedItem);
                return result;
            }
        }

        public T EndPop(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
        {
            var result = (AsyncResult<T>) asyncResult;
            return result.EndInvoke();
        }
    }

In order to avoid any interface requirements of the pooled objects, both the creation and resetting of the objects is performed by user supplied delegates: i.e.

Pool<MemoryStream> msPool = new Pool<MemoryStream>(() => new MemoryStream(2048), pms => {
        pms.Position = 0;
        pms.SetLength(0);
    }, 500);

In the case that the pool is empty, the BeginPop/EndPop pair provide an APM (ish) means of retrieving the object asynchronously when one becomes available (using Jeff Richter's excellent AsyncResult<TResult> implementation).

I can't quite remember why it is constained to T : class... there's probably none.

Answer 3

Sounds like you need a Factory pattern with caching.

You can try use .net reflector to look at the ThreadPool implementation.

Answer 4

In the upcoming version of .NET (4.0), there's a ConcurrentBag<T> class which can easily be utilized in an ObjectPool<T> implementation; in fact the there's an article on MSDN that shows you how to do precisely this.

If you don't have access to the latest .NET framework, you can get the System.Collections.Concurrent namespace (which has ConcurrentBag<T>) in .NET 3.5 from Microsoft's Reactive Extensions (Rx) library (in System.Threading.dll).

Answer 5

CodeProject has a sample ObjectPool implementation. Have a look here. Alternatively, there are some implementations here, here, and here.