Is ERD considered a kind of UML diagram?

Question

Are Entity Relationship Diagrams(ERD\'s) considered a type of UML diagram or are they a separate thing?

Answer 1

I have a different opinion to Jarek. There is nothing stopping you modelling data using UML. Remember that UML is not new at its foundations, It represents the evolution of a number of types of diagrams which had already existed (ERDs included), and an attempt to standardise these notations to create a consistent language for the communication of system design.

ERDs are used to model (largely) a static model of a system. They show (unsurprisingly) the relevant entities in a system and articulate the manner in which they are related.

In UML Class Diagrams were born from ER diagrams to represent the relationship between classes. If you consider that (in its simplest form) a class is the combination of data and methods, by ignoring methods you are left with a data model (albeit with a syntax which varies from traditional ERDs).

So ERDs correlate to Class Diagrams in UML if you choose to exclude methods and those aspects of the model designed to indicate data protection.

However UML itself serves a broader purpose, as a family of modelling tools that collectively can be used to model both the static and dynamic nature of a system. It includes diagrams that facilitate for a more complete model of a system than you can get through describing its entities (or data):

• Class Diagrams for static object relationship modelling,
• Object Diagrams for dynamic mnodelling of object/instance relationships
• State Machine/Diagrams for modelling how a system transitions through states
• Sequence and Collaboaration diagrams to demonstrate how components of a system will work together
• Activity Diagrams (replacing flow charts) to demonstrate/document imperative flow
• and a few others I'll leave you to investigate (check out http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/umlDiagrams.htm for an overview)

Answer 2

I have a different opinion to Andy. In UML Class Diagrams you describe relationship between two classes. With ERD you can talk about relationships between more than two entities.

This is the reason why the cardinality in Chen-Diagrams are on opposite site compared to UML Class Diagrams. You have to think about number of relations for every single entity.

Let's take a look at one simple example:

In this little example every supplier must be in relationship with at least one delivery. But there can be items not being delivered and projects without any deliveries.

Answer 3

I have an other idea. I think we should look in-depth.

When we are talking about ERD (Entity Relationship Diagram), we are talking about Entity Relationship Modeling.

It is firstly introduced by Peter Chen (1976). He has two famous articles on Entity Relationship Modeling (see first and second articles)

He talked about Entity-Relationship Modeling (not Entity-Relationship Diagram). It is ER Model.

There is another paper in 1975 about Modeling the Real World System.

ER Modeling is (see reference, the second paragraph):

In software engineering an ER model is commonly formed to represent things that a business needs to remember in order to perform business processes. Consequently, the ER model becomes an abstract data model that defines a data or information structure that can be implemented in a database, typically a relational database.

Diagramming Convention Techniques

When we are talking about ER Modeling, there many diagramming convention techniques.

1. Chen Notation (some links need translation)
2. IDEF1X Notation
3. Bechman Notation
4. Martin notation
5. (min, max)-notation of Jean-Raymond Abrial in 1974
6. UML class diagrams

And other notations (see reference)

All of above notations are using for ER Modeling or Data Modeling.

There is no earth-shattering difference between UML notation and other ER notations. They all model the most important elements of data models.

Finally: UML is a standard graphical tools to model the whole parts of project. We can use UML (Class Diagram) for ER Modeling and named them our ER Models or ERDs. So we can say: this is my ERD in UML Notation.

Answer 4

UML, as an object oriented notation, have nothing to data modeling. Lots times I read about attributes as data columns. It is not true. We can put to an attribute simple data or any complicated other object.

For data modeling (database, relational database) we use ERD diagram, for storing data in object systems we can use ORM (object relational model), it is mixed UML/Data model, if we use pattern like a active table or active record.

Answer 5

ERD is it's own thing. It's not in UML specification. You can download specification PDF from the link.

UML is a common notation/language for object oriented modeling and it includes a multitude of diagram types. ERD is a diagram for data modeling (attributes and relationships). Some structural UML diagrams are fairly similar in what you can model, but the concept is different.

Types of UML diagrams:

Answer 6

This was the first search on Google:

Key Difference: UML stands for Unified Modeling Language. ERD stands for Entity Relationship Diagram. UML is a popular and standardized modeling language that is primarily used for object oriented softwares. Entity-Relationship diagrams are used in structured analysis and conceptual modeling