Leak canary, Recyclerview leaking mAdapter

Question

I decided it was high time I learned how to use Leak Canary to detect Leaks within my apps, and as I always do, I tried to implement it in my project to really understand how to

Answer 1

I was able to fix this by overriding RecyclerView. It happens because RecyclerView never unregisters itself from AdapterDataObservable.

@Override protected void onDetachedFromWindow() {
    super.onDetachedFromWindow();
    if (getAdapter() != null) {
        setAdapter(null);
    }
}

Answer 2

I can't open your image and see the actual leak but if you define a local variable for your RecyclerView in your Fragment and set your fragment's retainInstanceState true it can cause possible leaks with rotation.

When using a Fragment with retainInstance you should clear all your ui references in onDestroyView

@Override
public void onDestroyView() {
     yourRecyclerView = null;
     super.onDestroyView();
}

Here you can find a detailed information from this link: Retained Fragments with UI and memory leaks

Answer 3

First of all, I'm referencing this file.

It looks like v7.widget.RecyclerView is leaking the adapter, and not my application. But that can't be right.... right?

It's actually your adapter that's leaking the RecyclerView (and it's made pretty clear by the trace graph and the title of the LeakCanary activity). However, I'm not sure if it's the "parent" RecyclerView or the nested one in the HourlyViewHolder, or both. I think the culprits are your ViewHolders. By making them non-static inner classes, you explicitly provide them with the reference to the enclosing adapter class, ant this almost directly couples the adapter with the recycled views, since the parent of every itemView in your holders is the RecyclerView itself.

My first suggestion to fix this problem would be to decouple your ViewHolders and Adapter by making them static inner classes. That way they do not hold a reference to the adapter, so your context field will be inaccessible to them, and it's also a good thing, since context references should be passed and stored sparingly (also to avoid big memory leaks). When you need the context just to obtain the strings, do it somewhere else, for example in the adapter constructor, but do not store the context as a member. Finally, the DayForecastAdapter seems dangerous too: you pass the one, same instance of it to every HourlyViewHolder, which seems like a bug.

I think that fixing the design and decoupling these classes should get rid of this memory leak

Answer 4

If the adapter lives any longer than the RecyclerView does, you've got to clear the adapter reference in onDestroyView:

@Override
public void onDestroyView() {
    recyclerView.setAdapter(null);
    super.onDestroyView();
}

Otherwise the adapter is going to hold a reference to the RecyclerView which should have already gone out of memory.

If the screen is involved in transition animations, you actually have to take this one step further and only clear the adapter when the view has become detached:

@Override
public void onDestroyView() {
    recyclerView.addOnAttachStateChangeListener(new View.OnAttachStateChangeListener() {
        @Override
        public void onViewAttachedToWindow(View v) {
            // no-op
        }

        @Override
        public void onViewDetachedFromWindow(View v) {
            recyclerView.setAdapter(null);
        }
    });
    super.onDestroyView();
}