Best way to combine probabilistic classifiers in scikit-learn

Question

I have a logistic regression and a random forest and I\'d like to combine them (ensemble) for the final classification probability calculation by taking an average.

Is t

Answer 1

NOTE: The scikit-learn Voting Classifier is probably the best way to do this now

---

OLD ANSWER:

For what it's worth I ended up doing this as follows:

class EnsembleClassifier(BaseEstimator, ClassifierMixin):
    def __init__(self, classifiers=None):
        self.classifiers = classifiers

    def fit(self, X, y):
        for classifier in self.classifiers:
            classifier.fit(X, y)

    def predict_proba(self, X):
        self.predictions_ = list()
        for classifier in self.classifiers:
            self.predictions_.append(classifier.predict_proba(X))
        return np.mean(self.predictions_, axis=0)

Answer 2

Now scikit-learn has StackingClassifier which can be used to stack multiple estimators.

from sklearn.datasets import load_iris  
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.svm import LinearSVC
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline
from sklearn.ensemble import StackingClassifier
X, y = load_iris(return_X_y=True)
estimators = [
    ('rf', RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=10, random_state=42)),
    ('lg', LogisticRegression()))
   ]
clf = StackingClassifier(
estimators=estimators, final_estimator=LogisticRegression()
)
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(
    X, y, stratify=y, random_state=42
)
clf.fit(X_train, y_train)
clf.predict_proba(X_test)

Answer 3

Given the same problem, I used a majority voting method. Combing probabilities/scores arbitrarily is very problematic, in that the performance of your different classifiers can be different, (For example, an SVM with 2 different kernels , + a Random forest + another classifier trained on a different training set).

One possible method to "weigh" the different classifiers, might be to use their Jaccard score as a "weight". (But be warned, as I understand it, the different scores are not "all made equal", I know that a Gradient Boosting classifier I have in my ensemble gives all its scores as 0.97, 0.98, 1.00 or 0.41/0 . I.E. it's very overconfident..)

Answer 4

What about the sklearn.ensemble.VotingClassifier?

http://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.ensemble.VotingClassifier.html#sklearn.ensemble.VotingClassifier

Per the description:

The idea behind the voting classifier implementation is to combine conceptually different machine learning classifiers and use a majority vote or the average predicted probabilities (soft vote) to predict the class labels. Such a classifier can be useful for a set of equally well performing model in order to balance out their individual weaknesses.