check if a tree is a binary search tree

前端 未结 9 893
遥遥无期
遥遥无期 2021-01-30 09:29

I have written the following code to check if a tree is a Binary search tree. Please help me check the code:

Okay! The code is edited now. This simple solution was sugge

相关标签:
9条回答
  • 2021-01-30 10:01

    A Method should only do one thing at a time. Also the way you do things are generally Weird. I will give you some almost-Java pseudocode. Sorry for that, but I have not touched Java for some Time. I hope it helps. Look at the comments I also did on the Question and I hope you sort it out!

    Call your isBST like that :

    public boolean isBst(BNode node)
    {
        return isBinarySearchTree(node , Integer.MIN_VALUE , Integer.MIN_VALUE);
    }
    

    Internally :

    public boolean isBinarySearchTree(BNode node , int min , int max)
    {
        if(node.data < min || node.data > max)
            return false;
        //Check this node!
        //This algorithm doesn't recurse with null Arguments.
        //When a null is found the method returns true;
        //Look and you will find out.
        /*
         * Checking for Left SubTree
         */
        boolean leftIsBst = false;
        //If the Left Node Exists
        if(node.left != null)
        {
            //and the Left Data are Smaller than the Node Data
            if(node.left.data < node.data)
            {
                //Check if the subtree is Valid as well
                leftIsBst = isBinarySearchTree(node.left , min , node.data);
            }else
            {
                //Else if the Left data are Bigger return false;
                leftIsBst = false;
            }
        }else //if the Left Node Doesn't Exist return true;
        {
            leftIsBst = true;
        }
    
        /*
         * Checking for Right SubTree - Similar Logic
         */
        boolean rightIsBst = false;
        //If the Right Node Exists
        if(node.right != null)
        {
            //and the Right Data are Bigger (or Equal) than the Node Data
            if(node.right.data >= node.data)
            {
                //Check if the subtree is Valid as well
                rightIsBst = isBinarySearchTree(node.right , node.data+1 , max);
            }else
            {
                //Else if the Right data are Smaller return false;
                rightIsBst = false;
            }
        }else //if the Right Node Doesn't Exist return true;
        {
            rightIsBst = true;
        }
    
        //if both are true then this means that subtrees are BST too
        return (leftIsBst && rightIsBst);
    }
    

    Now : If you want to find the Min and Max Values of each Subtree you should use a Container (I used an ArrayList) and store a triplet of Node, Min, Max which represents the root node and the values (obviously).

    eg.

    /*
     * A Class which is used when getting subTrees Values
     */
    class TreeValues
    {
        BNode root; //Which node those values apply for
        int Min;
        int Max;
        TreeValues(BNode _node , _min , _max)
        {
            root = _node;
            Min = _min;
            Max = _max;
        }
    }
    

    And a :

    /*
     * Use this as your container to store Min and Max of the whole
     */
    ArrayList<TreeValues> myValues = new ArrayList<TreeValues>;
    

    Now this is a method which finds the Min and Max values of a given node:

    /*
     * Method Used to get Values for one Subtree
     * Returns a TreeValues Object containing that (sub-)trees values
     */ 
    public TreeValues GetSubTreeValues(BNode node)
    {
        //Keep information on the data of the Subtree's Startnode
        //We gonna need it later
        BNode SubtreeRoot = node;
    
        //The Min value of a BST Tree exists in the leftmost child
        //and the Max in the RightMost child
    
        int MinValue = 0;
    
        //If there is not a Left Child
        if(node.left == null)
        {
            //The Min Value is this node's data
            MinValue = node.data;
        }else
        {
            //Get me the Leftmost Child
            while(node.left != null)
            {
                node = node.left;
            }
            MinValue = node.data;
        }
        //Reset the node to original value
        node = SubtreeRoot; //Edit - fix
        //Similarly for the Right Child.
        if(node.right == null)
        {
            MaxValue = node.data;
        }else
        {
            int MaxValue = 0;
            //Similarly
            while(node.right != null)
            {
                node = node.right;
            }
            MaxValue = node.data;
        }
        //Return the info.
        return new TreeValues(SubtreeRoot , MinValue , MaxValue);   
    }
    

    But this returns Values for one Node only, So we gonna use this to find for the Whole Tree:

    public void GetTreeValues(BNode node)
    {
        //Add this node to the Container with Tree Data 
        myValues.add(GetSubTreeValues(node));
    
        //Get Left Child Values, if it exists ...
        if(node.left != null)
            GetTreeValues(node.left);
        //Similarly.
        if(node.right != null)
            GetTreeValues(node.right);
        //Nothing is returned, we put everything to the myValues container
        return; 
    }
    

    Using this methods, your call should look like

    if(isBinarySearchTree(root))
        GetTreeValues(root);
    //else ... Do Something
    

    This is almost Java. It should work with some modification and fix. Find a good OO book, it will help you. Note, that this solution could be broke down into more methods.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-30 10:03

    UPDATE: I just saw that this solution was suggested before. Sorry about this guys, maybe somebody still finds my version useful

    Here is a solution that uses In-Order Traversal to check for BST property. Before I provide the solution, I am using a definition of a BST that doesn't allow duplicates. This means that each value in the BST is unique (this is just for simplicity).

    Code for recursive inorder print:

    void printInorder(Node root) {
        if(root == null) {                 // base case
            return;
        }
        printInorder(root.left);           // go left
        System.out.print(root.data + " "); // process (print) data
        printInorder(root.right);          // go right
    }
    

    After this inorder traversal on a BST, all the data should be printed in sorted ascending order. For example the tree:

       5
     3   7
    1 2 6 9
    

    would have inorder print:

    1 2 3 5 6 7 9
    

    Now, instead of printing the node, we can keep track of the previous value in the In-Order sequence and compare it to the current node's value. If the current node's value is smaller than the previous value, this means that the sequence isn't in the ascending sorted order and that the BST property is violated.

    For example, the tree:

       5
     3   7
    1 8 6 9
    

    Has a violation. The right child of 3 is 8 and this would be ok if 3 was the root node. However, in a BST 8 would end up as a left child of 9 and not as a right child of 3. Therefore, this tree is not a BST. So, the code that follow this idea:

    /* wrapper that keeps track of the previous value */
    class PrevWrapper {
        int data = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
    }
    
    boolean isBST(Node root, PrevWrapper prev) {
        /* base case: we reached null*/
        if (root == null) {
            return true;
        }
    
        if(!isBST(root.left, prev)) {
            return false;
        }
        /* If previous in-order node's data is larger than
         * current node's data, BST property is violated */
        if (prev.data > root.data) {
            return false;
        }
    
        /* set the previous in-order data to the current node's data*/
        prev.data = root.data;
    
        return isBST(root.right, prev);
    }
    
    boolean isBST(Node root) {
        return isBST(root, new PrevWrapper());
    }
    

    The in-order traversal for the sample tree would fail the check for node 5 since previous in-order of 5 is 8, which is larger so BST property is violated.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-30 10:07

    It doesn't really make much sense to return INTEGER.MIN,INTEGER.MAX as the values for an empty tree. Perhaps use an Integer and return null instead.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题