Ideas for Natural Language Processing project? [closed]

Answer 1

Use the twitter API's to pull all the tweets from a social conversation and combine\summarize\publish the content as a essay\article\blog\etc that someone can read in one piece. Correlate concepts and ideas, expand references, improve grammar. Kind of like bettween.com but souped up with NLP.

Answer 2

I advise against the use of Java, unless there is a library that you desperately need. I did an NLP final project in Java once and found that it lacks a lot of flexibility that is often needed (strict type system, no anonymous functions etc.). Unfortunately, I don't know OCaml, but in case you know Python, there are a lot of NLP libraries available for that, e.g., the very comprehensive and actively developed NLTK.

Answer 3

1) Take a body of text and convert all references of "her" to either "him" or "his". Basically, this question from SO, which seems like a neat project.

2) I'm assuming that you've studied the transformational grammar approach to trees (X-bar theory, etc.) There is this whole other syntactic theory called Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG) which posits not the use of "hierarchy" for describing syntax, but uses attribute-value matrices as well.

One of the advantages of using this system is that you can describe syntax as directed acyclic graphs, rather than trees. Your prof might be able to point you to more/better resources, but this page (vaguely) explains the idea. Unfortunately, my experience has been that HPSG resources on the net are pretty lacking.

But, once you have a feel for HPSG feature structures, you can search the literature for people (linguists and computational linguists) who've come up with ways to use the graph representations for interesting things.

Maybe you could create a transformational tree-to-HPSG graph converter? (You'd have to know how things like "raising", "control", "passivizations", etc would be transformed into HPSG's "SLASH", "REL", etc.)

Answer 4

1 - What would be great for me is when you review academic papers and i need to know which part of the work is: -completely original -what is purely copy/paste -what is a pure paraphrase -what is saying exactly the opposite of a previous reference. Ideally, it would check the references inside the paper + all the previous work of the authors (and may check citeseer to look for references which have been potentially omitted -voluntarily-). That would be really useful.

2- I would like a tool checking all the questions in SO, looking for the same kind of questions with a bunch of responses and generating a response that may be adequate.

Answer 5

May I suggest that you look into the programming language Prolog. It is a declarative logic programming language with natural language processing being one of its early goals. About halfway down that Wiki page is an example of how you can use it as a language parser. You can make it easily generate thousands of grammatically correct sentences and phrases. It is a very powerful tool. I think using it would be very interesting.

Answer 6

1. Obnoxious language filtering - I think this will reduce down to a process very similar to spam email filtering. That is, counting the frequency of a set of more-or-less 'obnoxious' words. It doesn't sound like you will get the scope to do anything particularly clever, unless you also use other sources of information (e.g. the structure of the social links shared between the sender and recipient, perhaps). On the other hand, online bullying is a very serious thing and you can bet Facebook/Myspace and the other social networking sites care a lot about tackling it.

2. Stylistic Analysis - There has been some work done on this in various forms, often under the name authorship analysis. Shlomo Argamon does a lot of work in this area and you could probably discover a lot more from the references in his papers. One of the best ways to profile an author is to learn the distribution of their usage of a set of stopwords (a.k.a functional words), such as 'and' ,'but', 'if', etc. I think there's a lot more scope to do something new and interesting in this area - authorship analysis on internet data is a hard problem - but also a lot more scope to fail.

3. Chat bot - You're right, this is a pretty standard project. It's also quite hard to measure success/failure. I think the project would be more compelling if it was a chat-bot with some kind of purpose, like answering questions in a limited domain, but that's something that's very difficult to do well.

The rest are really too vague to make any comments on, sorry.

There aren't any NLP libraries that I know of in OCaml, it's just not a particularly popular programming language. However, I do know of a machine learning library in Ocaml, called MEGAM, written by Hal Daume, who is a very good NLP researcher, which has been used for NLP tasks. I get a feeling that figuring out MEGAM and using it to do some NLP task might be too big a project to take on, however.

Some other ideas:

• Sentiment Analysis - A very trendy area of research. You could make this task as easy or hard as you like, from scoring a document as positive/negative to extracting specific topics and generating a sentiment score for each one.
• Coreference/Anaphora resolution - A difficult task but a very important one. Some approaches use a graph representation (each mention is a node with edges between them if they co-refer) to enforce things like transitivity.
• Document Classification - You could try and learn a system on the StackOverflow data set to suggest tags for a given question. It's a fairly well known problem with some established techniques, but an it's interesting data set and has an obvious and useful application to the real world . You could also see if you can find specific features of a question (word choice, length, formatting, punctuation, etc.) that cause them to be voted highly.
• Haiku Generation - Kind of a silly one, but I always thought it was an interesting idea. Syllable counting could be done with the CMU pronouncing dictionary. Should be a lot of fun, if not particularly useful.