Confused about 'respond_to' vs 'respond_to?'

Question

I am learning Rails with railstutorial.org, and I am confused about something: in this chapter the author tells us to do some testing in the console with the respond_to?

Answer 1

Ruby treats ? and ! as actual characters in a method name. respond_to and respond_to? are different. ? indicates that this should respond with a true or false (by convention; this is not a requirement). Specifically:

respond_to? is a Ruby method for detecting whether the class has a particular method on it. For example,

@user.respond_to?('eat_food')

would return true if the User class has an eat_food method on it.

respond_to is a Rails method for responding to particular request types. For example:

def index
  @people = Person.find(:all)

  respond_to do |format|
    format.html
    format.xml { render :xml => @people.to_xml }
  end
end

However, in the RailsTutorial link you've provided, you're seeing an RSpec method should interacting with RSpec's respond_to method. This wouldn't be available in your console, unless you run rails console test.

Answer 2

The test uses convenient helpers to be more user friendly.

Ruby is Ruby so using the good old respond_to? would work if you call it this way:

 @user.respond_to?(:encrypted_password).should be_true

There is another respond_to used in controllers but still nothing to do with those you already met.

Answer 3

respond_to? is a Boolean evaluation. The respond_to is used (normally) for determining the display information. More information here. The respond_to? checks to see if a method exists and returns true if it does and false if it doesn't.