I initialize an array this way:
array = Array.new
array << \'1\' << \'2\' << \'3\'
Is it possible to do that in one s
To create such an array you could do:
array = ['1', '2', '3']
To prove There's More Than One Six Ways To Do It:
plus_1 = 1.method(:+)
Array.new(3, &plus_1) # => [1, 2, 3]
If 1.method(:+) wasn't possible, you could also do
plus_1 = Proc.new {|n| n + 1}
Array.new(3, &plus_1) # => [1, 2, 3]
Sure, it's overkill in this scenario, but if plus_1
was a really long expression, you might want to put it on a separate line from the array creation.
Oneliner:
array = [] << 1 << 2 << 3 #this is for fixnums.
or
a = %w| 1 2 3 4 5 |
or
a = [*'1'..'3']
or
a = Array.new(3, '1')
or
a = Array[*'1'..'3']
Along with the above answers , you can do this too
=> [*'1'.."5"] #remember *
=> ["1", "2", "3", "4", "5"]
You can do
array = ['1', '2', '3']
As others have noted, you can also initialize an array with %w notation like so:
array = %w(1 2 3)
or
array = %w[1 2 3]
Please note that in both cases each element is a string, rather than an integer. So if you want an array whose elements are integers, you should not wrap each element with apostrophes:
array_of_integers = [1, 2, 3]
Also, you don't need to put comma in between the elements (which is necessary when creating an array without this %w notation). If you do this (which I often did by mistake), as in:
wrong_array = %w(1, 2, 3)
its elements will be three strings ---- "1,", "2,", "3". So if you do:
puts wrong_array
the output will be:
1,
2,
3
=>nil
which is not what we want here.
Hope this helps to clarify the point!
You can initialize an array in one step by writing the elements in []
like this:
array = ['1', '2', '3']