Does Python have anything Like Capybara/Cucumber?

后端 未结 7 1164
星月不相逢
星月不相逢 2021-01-29 23:48

Ruby has this great abstraction layer on top of Selenium called Capybara, which you can use do functional/acceptance/integration testing. It also has another library called Cuc

相关标签:
7条回答
  • 2021-01-30 00:00

    There does now exist a port of Capybara itself to Python:

    https://github.com/elliterate/capybara.py

    You can find its documentation here:

    https://elliterate.github.io/capybara.py/

    Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Selenium support built in.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-30 00:08

    The OP asked for Python implementations of Cucumber or Capybara but as Jim Stewart pointed out in his answer, Cucumber and Capybara are very different things. Since the title of the question is about Capybara, that's what I will answer.

    I am one of the developers of a commercial Selenium wrapper called Helium. Like Capybara, it offers a very high-level API for web automation. For example, here is a script that updates your Facebook status:

    from helium.api import *
    start_chrome("facebook.com")
    write(your_fb_email, into="Email or Phone")
    write(your_fb_password, into="Password")
    click("Log In")
    write("Test", into="Update Status")
    click("Post")
    

    Calls to Helium can freely be mixed with calls to Selenium. Eg. we could extend the above script by:

    # get_driver() returns the WebDriver created by start_chrome() above.
    chrome = get_driver()
    chrome.find_element_by_id('btnG').click()
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-30 00:12

    You can test Python code using Cucumber - see the Cucumber wiki on github for more information.

    If you want a pure Python solution, check out Lettuce. I've never used it, but there is a fairly useful looking blog entry about it and splinter here.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-30 00:13

    While the OP was happy with finding a Python Cucumber equivalent, what led me here was the question title: a Python equivalent of Capybara. While Cucumber uses Capybara, Cucumber itself is a whole different "solution" that is only incidentally related to Capybara.

    If you're looking for something Capybara-like without having to deal with Cucumber, check out splinter. I don't know what was true when the question was posted, but Splinter is now built on Selenium, and supports other engines as well (Webkit, PhantomJS, zope.browsertest, and others), and supports both visual and headless testing.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-30 00:13

    Have you checked freshen, or pea?

    Pea does not use the syntax of cucumber, but the author says that is easier https://github.com/gfxmonk/pea

    And Freshen is trying to clone Cucumber's syntax and functionalities

    https://github.com/rlisagor/freshen

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-30 00:16

    A. Cucumber like: ( English like)

    • Lettuce (Approach Gherkin) or
    • Behave (Approach Gherkin) or
    • Robotframework (Approach keyword based) (Additional Info: RF is larger than English Like criteria. Its keyword-based and offers loads of helper method and inbuilt libraries. Great eco-sysstem for external libraries. Any python script can also be modified and used along with RF)
    • Freshen (Approach Gherkin) or
    • Pea (Approach Gherkin) or
    • RedwoodHQ (Approach keyword based) (RedwoodHQ has features larger than 'English-Like' criteria and encapsulates the following features: Keyword based, web-based test-framework, supports python as one of languages and much more. Additional info on RedwoodHQ: Theoretically its possible, all the existing robot-framework inbuilt libraries and all robot-framework external test-libraries or for that matter any python library, can be called or used from this web based test framework with little modification)

    • Gauge (Gherkin approach): Reference for python: (https://gauge-python.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html)


    Underneath Cucumber, one could have Capybara like abstraction layer that hides/ groups many of selenium actions


    B. Capybara like: ( Abstraction: hides / groups action)

    As one e.g to click an element, its sufficient to provide command like click(locator) instead of working with raw selenium api, where one needs to find an element and then click. Many more such abstraction exist in the optional libraries below

    • Option-1 (see below)
    • Option-2 (see below)
    • Option-3 (see below)
    • Option-4 (see below)
    • Option-5 (see below)
    • Option-6 : Helium (from others Answer/comment)
    • Option-7 : (see below)
    • Option-8 : (see below)
    • Option-9: (see below)
    • Option-10: (see below)
    • Option-11: (see below)
    • Option-12: (see below)
    • Option-13: (see below)

    My research: There exist almost half a dozen a. active, b. mature c.developed options.

    python comes with variety of batteries included !!


    Option-1: Selenium2Library

    Github url: https://github.com/rtomac/robotframework-selenium2library

    Developement: Active

    Purpose: one of the many libraries of robotframework, can also be used as "standalone" library for your framework (Check e.g below for usage).

    Thoughts:

    • It provides an abstraction over selenium
    • input of arguments to methods in this library are lot simpler. Abstraction provided by library, one e.g, hides many of the unnecessary details for finding elements. For more details one needs to understand the library
    • It is possible to use this library outside robot-framework context as such without any modification, though it could be using utilities of robot package. (Its your homework to do further experiments with this lib, on this note!)
    • Therefore, can be used as a standalone library for your framework.

    Usage:

    pip install robotframework-selenium2library

    import in your ipython or idle console and start playing e.g:

    >>from Selenium2Library import Selenium2Library
    >>start_testing= Selenium2Library()
    >>start_testing.create_webdriver("Firefox")
    >>start_testing.go_to("http://www.google.com")
    >>.
    ...so on
    

    Option-2: Pageobjects

    Github url: https://github.com/ncbi/robotframework-pageobjects

    Development: InActive (no show stoppers with latest release)

    Purpose: One of the libraries of robotframework. Provides a page object abstraction over Selenium2Library. Can be used as Standalone for your framework (Check e.g below for usage) or can be used along with robotframework.

    Thoughts:

    • It provides a "pageobject abstraction" support on top of Selenium2Library
    • It is possible to use this library outside robot-framework context as such without any modification, though it could be using utilities of robot package. (Its your homework to do further experiments on this note!)
    • Therefore, can be used as a standalone library

    Usage:

    pip install robotframework-pageobjects

    e.g: in ipython or idle do:

    >>from robotpageobjects import Page
    >>start_testing=Page()
    >>start_testing.create_webdriver("Firefox")
    >>start_testing.go_to("http://google.com")
    

    Option-3: robotframework-pageobjectlibrary

    Github Url: https://github.com/boakley/robotframework-pageobjectlibrary

    Development: Active

    Hopefully Author supports LTS (Long Term Support) : )) , Fingers crossed !!

    Usage:

    pip install robotframework-pageobjectlibrary

    Thoughts:

    • It is NOT possible to use this library outside robot-framework context. A minor change to how the page context is handled would help this library to be used outside robot-framework context (Its your homework to find out how!)

    Option-4: Splinter

    Github url: https://github.com/cobrateam/splinter

    Developement: Active

    Usage: splinter.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html

    pip install splinter

    On ipython or idle do:

    >>from splinter import Browser    
    >>browser = Browser()
    >>browser.visit('http://google.com')
    >>browser.fill('q', 'splinter - python acceptance testing for web applications')
    >>browser.find_by_name('btnG').click()
    

    Option-5: SST library

    Github url: https://github.com/Work4Labs/selenium-simple-test

    Development: Feature complete / Active

    Usage: testutils.org/sst/

    pip install -U sst

    on ipython or idle do:

    >>> from sst.actions import *
    >>> start()
    
        Starting Firefox
    >>> go_to('http://google.com')
        Going to... http://google.com
        Waiting for get_element
    

    Option-6: helium Not open source (Commercial)

    Option-7: holmium.core

    Github url: https://github.com/alisaifee/holmium.core

    Option-8: wtframework

    Github url: https://github.com/wiredrive/wtframework

    Option-9: webium

    Github url: https://github.com/wgnet/webium

    Option-10: elementium

    Github url: https://github.com/actmd/elementium

    Option-11: saunter

    Github url: https://github.com/Element-34/py.saunter

    Usage: saunter

    Option-12: webdriverplus

    Github url: https://github.com/tomchristie/webdriverplus

    Usage: webdriverplus

    Comments: repository not maintained but decent reference

    Option-12: Simple-Pageobject

    Github url: https://github.com/rama-bornfree/simple-pageobject/tree/master/PageObjectLibrary

    Comments: Simplest pageobject wrapper built around selenium2library. I am the owner of the repo


    Test-setup:

    "All" the Test libraries in Option-1-13; can be run using any of the following framework: Lettuce, Behave, Robotframework or for that matter, any unit test framework(e.g PyUnit, Nose)...so on .

    Test Framework is in general used to manage test-cases e.g

    • English formats like gherkin, keyword, tabular so on ...
    • reporting a test-run
    • hooking to CI
    • set-up/tear-down of test-cases and test-suites
    • tagging of test-cases
    • other functionalities that one could think on about any test-framework

    What matters is how comfortable one gets with libraries in above options.

    Option-5: As far as SST is concerned, it has features of a framework itself, e.g it can generate report and do many more things.

    So the definition of library and framework in the case of SST is blurred, depending on the extent of features one would like to use from that package


    Some Math for Fun:

    Total number of ways one could have a good, bad, and ugly Test-setup = (Test framework AND Test library + your custom code sandwiched b/w the framework and library ):

    7 * 13 = 91 Ways

    Choose the best combination (of Test Framework And Test library) that suits ones need !!

    I would personally go for Robot-framework with Selenium2Library or Robot-framework with some pageobject library

    ofcourse, I am leaned and positively biased in my post about robot-framework and Selenium2Library

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题