I have cloned a git repository and then checked out a tag:
# git checkout 2.4.33 -b my_branch
This is OK, but when I try to run git pull<
This command is deprecated: git branch --set-upstream master origin/master
So, when trying to set up tracking, this is the command that worked for me:
git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/master master
Try these commands:
git pull origin master
git push -u origin master
You need to set up your tracking (upstream) for the current branch
git branch --set-upstream master origin/master
Is already deprecated instead of that you can use --track flag
git branch --track master origin/master
I also like the doc reference that @casey notice:
-u <upstream>
Set up <branchname>'s tracking information so <upstream> is considered
<branchname>'s upstream branch. If no <branchname> is specified,
then it defaults to the current branch.
I had the same problem and fixed it with this command:
$ git push -u origin master
From the help file the -u basically sets the default for pulls:
-u, --set-upstream`
For every branch that is up to date or successfully pushed, add
upstream (tracking) reference, used by argument-less git-pull(1) and
other commands. For more information, see branch.<name>.merge in
git-config(1).
If like me you need to do this all the time, you can set up an alias to do it automatically by adding the following to your .gitconfig
file:
[alias]
set-upstream = !git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/`git symbolic-ref --short HEAD`
When you see the message There is no tracking information...
, just run git set-upstream
, then git push
again.
Thanks to https://zarino.co.uk/post/git-set-upstream/
In order to just download updates:
git fetch origin master
However, this just updates a reference called origin/master
. The best way to update your local master
would be the checkout/merge mentioned in another comment. If you can guarantee that your local master
has not diverged from the main trunk that origin/master
is on, you could use git update-ref
to map your current master
to the new point, but that's probably not the best solution to be using on a regular basis...