Diff output from two programs without temporary files

Question

Say I have too programs a and b that I can run with ./a and ./b.

Is it possible to diff their outputs without first w

Answer 1

For anyone curious, this is how you perform process substitution in using the Fish shell:

Bash:

diff <(./a) <(./b)

Fish:

diff (./a | psub) (./b | psub)

Unfortunately the implementation in fish is currently deficient; fish will either hang or use a temporary file on disk. You also cannot use psub for output from your command.

Answer 2

Adding to both the answers, if you want to see a side by side comparison, use vimdiff:

vimdiff <(./a) <(./b)

Something like this:

Answer 3

Adding a little more to the already good answers (helped me!):

The command docker outputs its help to STD_ERR (i.e. file descriptor 2)

I wanted to see if docker attach and docker attach --help gave the same output

$ docker attach

$ docker attach --help

Having just typed those two commands, I did the following:

$ diff <(!-2 2>&1) <(!! 2>&1)

!! is the same as !-1 which means run the command 1 before this one - the last command

!-2 means run the command two before this one

2>&1 means send file_descriptor 2 output (STD_ERR) to the same place as file_descriptor 1 output (STD_OUT)

Hope this has been of some use.

Answer 4

For zsh, using =(command) automatically creates a temporary file and replaces =(command) with the path of the file itself. With normal Process Substitution, $(command) is replaced with the output of the command.

This zsh feature is very useful and can be used like so to compare the output of two commands using a diff tool, for example Beyond Compare:

bcomp  =(ulimit -Sa | sort) =(ulimit -Ha | sort)

For Beyond Compare, note that you must use bcomp for the above (instead of bcompare) since bcomp launches the comparison and waits for it to complete. If you use bcompare, that launches comparison and immediately exits due to which the temporary files created to store the output of the commands disappear.

Read more here: http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Intro/intro_7.html

Also notice this:

Note that the shell creates a temporary file, and deletes it when the command is finished.

and the following which is the difference between $(...) and =(...) :

If you read zsh's man page, you may notice that <(...) is another form of process substitution which is similar to =(...). There is an important difference between the two. In the <(...) case, the shell creates a named pipe (FIFO) instead of a file. This is better, since it does not fill up the file system; but it does not work in all cases. In fact, if we had replaced =(...) with <(...) in the examples above, all of them would have stopped working except for fgrep -f <(...). You can not edit a pipe, or open it as a mail folder; fgrep, however, has no problem with reading a list of words from a pipe. You may wonder why diff <(foo) bar doesn't work, since foo | diff - bar works; this is because diff creates a temporary file if it notices that one of its arguments is -, and then copies its standard input to the temporary file.

Answer 5

Use <(command) to pass one command's output to another program as if it were a file name. Bash pipes the program's output to a pipe and passes a file name like /dev/fd/63 to the outer command.

diff <(./a) <(./b)

Similarly you can use >(command) if you want to pipe something into a command.

This is called "Process Substitution" in Bash's man page.

Answer 6

One option would be to use named pipes (FIFOs):

mkfifo a_fifo b_fifo
./a > a_fifo &
./b > b_fifo &
diff a_fifo b_fifo

... but John Kugelman's solution is much cleaner.