What is SOA (Service Oriented Architecture)?

前端 未结 12 1617
遇见更好的自我
遇见更好的自我 2021-01-29 18:02

Call me a troll if you want, but I\'m serious: how exactly is the new SOA trend any different than the client-service architecture that I was building 15 years ago?

相关标签:
12条回答
  • 2021-01-29 18:43

    Professor Frank Leymann from the University of Stuttgart takes SOA as a key concept for his Service oriented Computing (SOC) research work as he speaks about SOA. He is seen to be asked about the definition of SOA and the ensuing conversation could be a good read.

    Please note that our roadmap is about "service oriented computing (SoC)", i.e. the compute paradigm behind service-orientation. Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) is an architectural realization of this compute paradigm. You may compare this with "client/server computing" as paradigm and "browser/web server" or "DB-client/stored procedure" as two (of various other) architectural realizations of this paradigm.

    ...

    SOA is not completely new. Some individual aspects of SOA are used in practice for a long time. For example, take a look at "loose coupling": Enterprises are using reliable messaging technology since decades to integrate applications, i.e. to loosely couple them. Don't get me wrong, there are new concepts in SOA, e.g. concepts resulting from the combination of concepts put together in SOA, i.e. they result from emergence.

    Web Service specifications make the corresponding technologies available cross platform. I.e. the corresponding specifications do not invent fundamentally new concepts but define how these concepts and corresponding implementations work in heterogeneous environments. The resulting interoperability is groundbreaking, making SOA real.

    In summary, SOA is a mixture of mature things and new emerging things.

    There is also a SoC paper reference dated April 2006.


    A google search identifies Prof. Frank Leymann and his works.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-29 18:44

    A service-oriented architecture (SOA) is an architectural pattern in which softwares are designed as building block. i.e. Modular development, which makes flexibility to assemble any way we want. If you want to start new project instead of starting from scratch, we can reuse the services and if you want to new service we can easily integrate with existing service to make new project. So we can save lot of time and money.The basic principles of service oriented architecture are independent of vendors, products and technologies.

    Analogy: Toys build using Lego building blocks.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-29 18:46

    Neal Ford has many strong opinions regarding SOA. You might find his viewpoint interesting.

    Tactics vs. Strategy (SOA & The Tarpit of Irrelevancy)

    Standards Based vs. Standardized (SOA & the Tarpit of Irrelevancy)

    Tools & Anti-Behavior (SOA & the Tarpit of Irrelevancy)

    Rubick's Cubicle (SOA & the Tarpit of Irrelevancy)

    The Triumph of Hope over Reason (SOA & The Tarpit of Irrelevancy)

    Guerrilla SOA (SOA & The Tarpit of Irrelevancy)

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-29 18:47

    Forget about XML. Forget about WSDL. SOA is not a technology you can buy, though it's often marketed that way.

    The real point of SOA is all about IT organization. The point of SOA is to avoid having a huge bunch of "applications" that have isolated data pools and either don't talk to each other at all (and thus often duplicate data), or only in an inefficient, buggy way through adapter layers or EAI systems.

    For large companies, this is a serious problem - they have literally hundreds of separate apps that are insufficiently integrated. There's duplicate and inconsistent data everywhere and the result is that customers get pissed off and real money is lost because the billing department keeps sending invoices for a cancelled order and the customer service rep can't even find the order because it's cancelled in the order tracking system, but not the billing system.

    SOA is supposed to solve this by designing every app from the ground up to publish its services in a standardized, cross-platfrom manner so that other apps can access the data and don't have to duplicate it.

    From a business perspective, this is highly desirable. The buzzword hype and the acronym soup is just IT companies' attempts to cash in on that desirability. Unfortunately, this has (mis)led many people, including CEOs into believing that SOA is a product you can buy and it will magically make your IT more efficient, without realizing that this will only happen if you also reorganize your entire IT (and quite possibly your business units as well) to be SOA-compatible.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-29 18:47

    For me, a Service Oriented Architecture comes about when an Enterprise wishes to integrate a selection of disparate applications which concern a common domain into a set of interoperable services which operate against a single data source.

    In the case of a new startup company with an idea for an item of software/suite of softwares, I can't see how a company can kick off with a Service Oriented Architecture from the off. At first, each solution (which may well evolve into a service such that it may become interoperable) should seek to solve its problem space in isolation.

    Perhaps it will be in the roadmap for an enterprise capability or suite for each solution to become an interoperable service as the solutions are completed and enter service. For this, perhaps the development teams will undertake a modular/component oriented approach to building the soluton (eventual service), so as to make it easier to include the solution as a service in a Service Oriented Architecture.

    In the case where existing islands of software are to become interoperable services in a Service Oriented Architecture, the approach allows for the software items - which may be distributed and may be written in different languages - to communicate via an exposed API and/or common protocol (for example a flavor of Web Service) and generic data format (for example XML).

    SOA is an approach or idea. It is not a framework or a tool. When WDSLs and EJBs get name-dropped, this is often forgotten... as is that the idea of SOA is not new at all.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-29 18:59

    In fact, SOA also utilizes client-servier architecture. In addition, SOA is a way to design your software. Suppose that your application can break into simple and independent tasks like search a book, add new book, recommend a book according to user preference and so forth. If you consider a service (an API) for each of task, actually, you are using SOA. The advantage of this architecture is doesn't matter you're building a web app or mobile app, you only need the developed aforementioned services (APIs).

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题