Does if(fork()) create a child process? [closed]

Answer 1

Notice that if (fork()) /*etc*/ is exactly the same as

pid_t newtmp = fork();
if (newtmp != 0) /*etc*/

where newtmp is a fresh (new) variable name not occurring in your program (you could use x1, x2 etc.... provided it has no occurrence in your program), and pid_t is some integral type (probably int).

Once you rewrote your code with explicit and unique names given to result of fork you'll understand it better.

BTW, the code is poor taste. When you use fork you need to handle three cases:

• the fork failed (e.g. because your system has not enough memory, or because you exceeded some limits) and gives -1

• the fork succeeded in the child so gives 0

• the fork succeeded in the parent, so gives the pid of the child.

But when you code if (fork()) you are forgetting -or handling incorrectly- the first case (failure). It can rarely happen.

Read carefully (and several times) the fork(2) man page. Notice that fork is difficult to understand.

Regarding limits, be aware of setrlimit(2) (and the ulimit bash builtin).

Answer 2

The answer is

if (fork ())

may or may determine whether a child process was created.

Go to the man page:

http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/fork.2.html

We find that fork () returns three types of values:

• -1 => fork() failed
• 0 => return value in the child process
• a positive value => success and the PID of the child process.

Thus the test

if (fork ()) 

which is the same as

if (fork () != 0)

may succeed whether or not a child process was created. A competently written question would have said

if (fork () > 0)

Assuming everything works correctly:

int main() 
{
    int v=0;

    if(fork())  // Creates a child process that does nothing.
    {
        v++;

       if(!fork()) // Creates a child process that creates a child process (that then does nothing but decrement v).
       {
           fork();
          v--; 
       }
   }  
}