Should we use isDebugEnabled() while logging calculated data with Logback?

后端 未结 2 855
孤街浪徒
孤街浪徒 2021-01-28 01:03

Although in some tutorials, for example here (Parametrized logging section), said that Logback message {} parametrization help us to avoid unnecess

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2021-01-28 01:41

    Take a look at the example here

    Since 2.4, methods have been added to the Logger interface to support lambda expressions. The new methods allow client code to lazily log messages without explicitly checking if the requested log level is enabled. For example, previously one would write:

    // pre-Java 8 style optimization: explicitly check the log level
    // to make sure the expensiveOperation() method is only called if necessary
     if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
         logger.trace("Some long-running operation returned {}", expensiveOperation());
     }
    

    With Java 8, the same effect can be achieved with a lambda expression:

    // Java-8 style optimization: no need to explicitly check the log level:
    // the lambda expression is not evaluated if the TRACE level is not enabled
    logger.trace("Some long-running operation returned {}", () -> expensiveOperation());
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-28 01:58

    When you make a method call, e.g. employeeService.calculateBonus(employee), you're calling that method. Simple as that. So you are calculating the employee bonus every time this line is hit. There is no lazy evaluation here.

    Whether or not to use log.isDebugEnabled() depends on the situation. In this situation, if that method call is expensive, you should wrap that in a debug enabled check.

    In the case of getters, this isn't usually necessary. So, for instance, I would not wrap this in an isDebugEnabled check:

    log.debug("Calculating bonus for employee {} {}", employee.firstName(), employee.lastName());
    

    These are simple getters that return a String, so no expensive calculations are done.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题