I have a list of tuples, for example:
(0,2)
(0,5)
(2,0)
(2,5)
(3,4)
(4,3)
(5,0)
(5,2)
There are some tuples where (x, y)
You can groupBy
the tuples represented as a Set
, which will make Set(0, 5) == Set(5, 0)
, etc. Then map
the resulting Map
to the groups of tuples and convert it back to a List
, and finally grab the head
of each list for one representative of the group. Calling head
is ok here, because the groups will never be empty (they would otherwise just not be there at all).
val list = List((0,2), (0,5), (2,0), (2,5), (3,4), (4,3), (5,0), (5,2))
list.groupBy { case (x, y) => Set(x, y) } // Map[Set, List[(Set, (Int, Int))]]
.map(_._2) // Iterable[List[(Int, Int)]]
.toList // List[List[(Int, Int)]]
.map(_.head) // List[(Int, Int)]
res10: List[(Int, Int)] = List((0,5), (3,4), (2,5), (0,2))
How about first sorting the tuple pairs internally. I believe this technique would pass through your list just twice since distinct is advertised as O(n) complexity:
val ts = List((0,2),(0,5),(2,0),(2,5),(3,4),(4,3),(5,0),(5,2))
ts.map{ case (x,y) if x < y => (y,x) case (x,y) => (x,y) }.distinct
Using foldLeft
var ts = List((0,2), (0,5), (2,0), (2,5), (3,4), (4,3), (5,0), (5,2))
ts.foldLeft(List[(Int,Int)]())
{(acc, el) => if ((acc contains el) || (acc contains el.swap)) acc else el::acc}
// List[(Int, Int)] = List((3,4), (2,5), (0,5), (0,2))
Or, with Sets for an O(n) version (assuming Set lookup and additions are O(1))
ts.foldLeft(Set[(Int,Int)]()){(acc, el) => if (acc(el.swap)) acc else acc + el}
If it doesn't matter if we re-order ones where the swapped tuple is not present (I'm guessing it doesn't as you don't specify which of the ones that have a swapped tuple should be kept):
ts.map{t => if (t._1 < t._2) t else t.swap}.distinct
// List[(Int, Int)] = List((0,2), (0,5), (2,5), (3,4))