I have some postgres code I have created that is giving me an error:
ERROR: CASE types character varying and numeric cannot be matched
CODE:
The immediate cause for the error is the data type mismatch, as the error message tells you.
In the second and third column creations is where the problem is occurring.
All possible results of a CASE
expression need to share compatible data types so those must match but, obviously, don't. The manual instructs:
The data types of all the result expressions must be convertible to a single output type. See Section 10.5 for more details.
Assuming you refer to current_condition
and current_ecosite
- which are actually the 6th and 7th column, these need to have matching data types:
d.ecosite3
c.ecosite2
b.ecosite
and:
d.ecophase3
c.ecophase2
b.ecophase
Pending the missing table definition for boreal_mixedwood_labeled
, my educated guess is you can radically simplify to this query:
SELECT a.id, a.geom, a.condition_join_1, a.condition_join_2, a.condition_join_3
, COALESCE(d.condition3, c.condition2, b.condition) AS current_condition
, COALESCE(d.ecosite3, c.ecosite2, b.ecosite) AS current_ecosite
, COALESCE(d.ecophase3, c.ecophase2, b.ecophase) AS current_ecophase
, COALESCE(d.consite3, c.consite2, b.consite) AS current_consite
, COALESCE(d.conphase3, c.conphase2, b.conphase) AS current_conphase
FROM current_condition a
LEFT JOIN boreal_mixedwood_labeled b ON a.label = b.label_join_1
LEFT JOIN boreal_mixedwood_labeled c ON a.label2 = c.label_join_2
AND b.condition = 'ERROR'
LEFT JOIN boreal_mixedwood_labeled d ON a.label3 = d.label_join_3
AND c.condition2 = 'ERROR';
Data types must still match.
This is not just shorter, but probably faster, too.
Only join to boreal_mixedwood_labeled
a second time if b.condition = 'ERROR'
to begin with, etc.
Then you can use a simpler COALESCE expression: d.*
is NULL unless we need it, same goes for c.*
. The first non-null values is returned.
If some of the columns in boreal_mixedwood_labeled
can be NULL the logic can break. It all depends on ... tada! ... your actual table definition. (Did I mention that enough already?). Don't forget to include it with your next question ...
Try eliminating the nested case
. Maybe it makes a difference to the compiler for some reason:
CASE
WHEN b.condition = 'ERROR' AND c.condition2 = 'ERROR' THEN d.condition3
WHEN b.condition = 'ERROR' THEN c.condition2
ELSE c.condition
END as current_condition,
...