Marshall a List to XML works - but how to unmarshall?

Question

I can marshall a ObservableList using a \"Wrapper\"-class like below. But I cannot unmarshall it back to the wrapperclass it was before.

The idea is: I have an Observabl

Answer 1

MyListWrapper

If you want MyWrapperForList to unmarshal holding an instance of ObservableList then you will need to setup your class in one of the following ways.

Property of Type ObservableList

import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlAnyElement;
import javafx.collections.*;

public class MyWrapperForList<T> {

    private ObservableList<T> list;

    public MyWrapperForList() {
        list = FXCollections.<T>observableArrayList();
    }

    public MyWrapperForList(ObservableList<T> list) {
        this.list = list;
    }

    @XmlAnyElement(lax = true)
    public ObservableList<T> getItems() {
        return list;
    }

}

List Property Initialized to Instance of ObservableList

import java.util.List;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlAnyElement;
import javafx.collections.*;

public class MyWrapperForList<T> {

    private List<T> list = FXCollections.<T>observableArrayList();

    public MyWrapperForList() {
        list = FXCollections.<T>observableArrayList();
    }

    public MyWrapperForList(List<T> list) {
        this.list = list;
    }

    @XmlAnyElement(lax = true)
    public List<T> getItems() {
        return list;
    }

}

Demo Code

Input (nub.xml)

<List>
    <root>
        <category>[none]</category>
        <period>Year</period>
        <title>dfg</title>
        <value>4</value>
    </root>
    <root>
        <category>[none]</category>
        <period>Year</period>
        <title>ROBO</title>
        <value>1234</value>
    </root>
</List>

Demo

import java.util.List;
import javax.xml.bind.JAXBContext;
import javax.xml.bind.Unmarshaller;
import javax.xml.transform.stream.StreamSource;

public class Demo {

    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        JAXBContext jc = JAXBContext.newInstance(MyWrapperForList.class, Expense.class);

        //UNMARSHALLING
        Unmarshaller unmarshaller = jc.createUnmarshaller();

        StreamSource xml = new StreamSource("src/forum18594548/nub.xml");
        MyWrapperForList<Expense> wrapper = (MyWrapperForList<Expense>) unmarshaller.unmarshal(xml, MyWrapperForList.class).getValue();
        List<Expense> data = wrapper.getItems();

        System.out.println(data.getClass());
        for(Expense expense : data) {
            System.out.println(expense);
        }
   }

}

Output

class com.sun.javafx.collections.ObservableListWrapper
forum18594548.Expense@789df61d
forum18594548.Expense@4a8927c8

---

UPDATE

First: Thanks for you work Blaise!! I'm really glad for what you do to me! I tried what you wrote here (it was nearly the same as I had) and I got a similar (same type of) output as you got. BUT the objects in the lists are all referenced with null. If I write System.out.println(data.get(0).getTitle()); it says null. There is the exact amount of objects in the list, but all attributes are referenced with null. :(

I think I got tunnel vision on the ObservableList aspect only to miss your real problem was with how you mapped the Expense class. Since you only have get methods you should map to the fields using @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) as follows.

import javax.xml.bind.annotation.*;

@XmlRootElement(name="root")
@XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
public class Expense {

    private String title;
    private String category;
    private String period;
    private String value;

    public Expense() {
    }

    public Expense(String title, String value, String period, String category) {
        this.title = title;
        this.value = value;
        this.period = period;
        this.category = category;
    }

    public String getTitle() {
        return this.title;
    }

    public String getCategory() {
        return this.category;
    }

    public String getPeriod() {
        return this.period;
    }

    public String getValue() {
        return this.value;
    }

}