Inter-thread communication (worker threads)

后端 未结 4 571
轻奢々
轻奢々 2021-01-24 13:05

I\'ve created two threads A & B using CreateThread windows API. I\'m trying to send the data from thread A to B.

I know I can use Event object and wait for the Event

相关标签:
4条回答
  • 2021-01-24 13:49

    If you are concerned with minimizing Windows dependencies, and assuming you are coding in C++, then I recommend using Boost.Threads, which is a pretty nice, Posix-like C++ threading interface. This will give you easy portability between Windows and Linux.

    If you go this route, then use a mutex to protect any data shared across threads, and a condition variable (combined with the mutex) to signal one thread from the other.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-24 13:57

    First of all, you should keep in mind that Windows provides a number of mechanisms to deal with threading for you: I/O Completion Ports, old thread pools and new thread pools. Depending on what you're doing any of them might be useful for your purposes.

    As to "sending" data from one thread to another, you have a couple of choices. Windows message queues are thread-safe, and a a thread (even if it doesn't have a window) can have a message queue, which you can post messages to using PostThreadMessage.

    I've also posted code for a thread-safe queue in another answer.

    As far as having the thread continue executing, but take note when a change has happened, the typical method is to have it call WaitForSingleObject with a timeout value of 0, then check the return value -- if it's WAIT_OBJECT_0, the Event (or whatever) has been set, so it needs to take note of the change. If it's WAIT_TIMEOUT, there's been no change, and it can continue executing. Either way, WaitForSingleObject returns immediately.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-24 13:57

    Don´t use a mutexes when only working in one single process, beacuse it has more overhead (since it is a system-wide defined object)... Place a critical section around Your data and try to enter it (as Jerry Coffin did in his code around for the thread safe queue).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-24 14:04

    Since the two threads are in the same process (at least that's what it sounds like), then it is not necessary to "send" data. They can share it (e.g., a simple global variable). You do need to synchronize access to it via either an event, semaphore, mutex, etc.

    Depending on what you are doing, it can be very simple.

    Thread1Func() {
      Set some global data
      Signal semaphore to indicate it is available
    }
    
    Thread2Func() {
      WaitForSingleObject to check/wait if data is available
      use the data
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题