I\'m experimenting with template-template for fun. I have the following class:
template class T, typename R> class Unit
{
usi
You cannot make an alias for T
. The following was discussed in the committee to make an alias for T
(because a very late C++11 draft contained notes that stated that it is an alias for T
which a Defect Report cleaned up).
// Courtesy of @KerrekSB
template <template <typename> class T, typename R> class Unit
{
template <typename U> using MyTemplate = T<U>;
// ...
// use e.g. MyTemplate<int> to get T<int>
};
Note while MyTemplate<int>
is the same type as T<int>
, that MyTemplate
is not the same as T
. The wording at http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1286 was supposed to change that, but in the last meeting it was considered to be a very special machinery that doesn't really fit what alias templates turned out to be (own templates), and it was pushed back to review. To get that effect, a using MyTemplate = T;
in future may fit the bill (if proposed and accepted, of course).
Since T
isn't a type, the question as asked doesn't make sense. However, you can make an alias for T
, like:
template <template <typename> class T, typename R> class Unit
{
template <typename U> using MyTemplate = T<U>;
// ...
// use e.g. MyTemplate<int> to get T<int>
};
Pre-C++11 you would need something more notationally involved as outlined in this answer of mine (and used, for example, in the standard library by the standard allocator's rebind
mechanic.)