Should I always use a view model or is it ok to use ViewData?

Question

when do you think is it better to use ViewData over a view model?

I have the same exact partial view in a couple of main views. I\'d like to control how a partial view i

Answer 1

I think you should stick to using a ViewModel, your ViewModel is the class that defines your requirements for the view.

My reason behind this is that in the long run, it will be a lot more maintainable. When using ViewBag it's a dynamic class so in your views you should be checking if the ViewBag property exists (And can lead to silly mistakes like typo's) e.g.:

if(ViewBag.PropertyName != null)
{
    // ViewBag.PropertyName is a different property to ViewBag.propertyName
}

This type of code can make your View's quite messy. If you use a strongly typed model, you should be able to put most of the logic in your controllers and keep the View as clean as possible which is a massive plus in my books.

You also will also end up (if you use ViewBag) attempting to maintain it at some point and struggle. You are removing one great thing about C#, it's a strongly typed language! ViewBag is not strongly typed, you may think you are passing in a List<T> but you could just be passing a string.

One last point, you also will lose out on any intellisense features in Visual Studio.

I feel like it may start to be too messy in my project if I make view model for each action.

Wont it just be as messy in your controllers assigning everything to a ViewBag? If it was a ViewModel you could send it off to a 'Mapping' class to map your DTO to your View.

Instead of this:

// ViewModel
var model = new CustomViewModel()
{
    PropertyOne = result.FirstResult,
    PropertyTwo = result.SecondResult,
}
//ViewBag
ViewBag.PropertyOne = result.FirstResult;
ViewBag.PropertyTwo = result.SecondResult;

You could do this:

var mapper = new Map();
var model = mapper.MapToViewModel(result);

*You would obviously need to provide an implimentation to the mapping class, look at something like Automapper

I'd also prefer the partial view to accept only a view model which is a collection of records, just a pure IEnumerable<> object. I'd rather avoid to send the full view model object from a main view because it also contains a lot of different properties, objects, that control paging, sorting, filtering etc.

That is fine, just create a view model that has a property of IEnumerable<T>. In my opinion you should try and use a strongly typed ViewModel in all of your scenarios.