What is the static_cast runtime overhead if adding constness while keeping the same type?

Question

I find it irritating that I can call non-const functions of an object if I have a pointer to this object. I cannot let the pointer be a const pointer because there are also non-

Answer 1

The runtime overhead is essentially a pointer copy, which may be optimised out altogether.

But in your case, I'd consider changing int m_i; to mutable std::atomic<int> m_i; and make increment constant in the base class too. It looks like a reference counter and my way allows you to (i) retain const-correctness and (ii) be thread safe. I'd also consider changing int to unsigned to avoid undefined behaviour if m_i gets too big.