I\'m using Ploeh.SemanticComparison
\'s Likeness
as a way to effectively express intended outputs of a mapping process (as described in Mark Seemann\'s
If you had an Assertion helper class called AssertResemblance
(like [4]), and a static
helper like [1] in scope you could say it like:
var expected = new { ProductId = id, Name = name, Version = version };
AssertResemblance.Like( expected, result, WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier );
Or if you had an extension method like [2], you could do it like:
AssertResemblance.Like( expected,result,x=>x.WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier());
Or you could have the best of both worlds (no noise as in the first snippet) yet naming the Resemblance (by having the actual impl in an extension method) by implementing a local static helper in terms of the extension method ([2]) as in [3].
[1]
public static Likeness<T, NewMappingsEvent> WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier<T>( Likeness<T, NewMappingsEvent> that )
{
return that.Without( x => x.ProgrammaticIdentifier );
}
[2]
static class NewMappingsEventResemblances
{
public static Likeness<T, NewMappingsEvent> WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier<T>( this Likeness<T, NewMappingsEvent> that )
{
return that.Without( x => x.ProgrammaticIdentifier );
}
}
[3]
static Likeness<T, NewMappingsEvent> WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier<T>( Likeness<T, NewMappingsEvent> that )
{
return that.WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier();
}
[4]
static class AssertResemblance
{
public static void Like<T, T2>( T expected, T2 actual )
{
Like( expected, actual, x => x );
}
public static void Like<T, T2>( T expected, T2 actual, Func<Likeness<T, T2>, Likeness<T, T2>> configureLikeness )
{
var likeness = expected.AsSource().OfLikeness<T2>();
configureLikeness( likeness ).ShouldEqual( actual );
}
}