How to specify argument type in a dynamically typed language, i.e. Python?

后端 未结 5 1636
甜味超标
甜味超标 2021-01-23 13:11

Is there any such equivalent of Java

String myMethod (MyClass argument) {...}

in Python?

Thank you, Tomas

相关标签:
5条回答
  • 2021-01-23 13:22

    No. (And more stuff to round this up to 15 characters...)

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-23 13:24

    I just want to say that I'm in full agreement that type checking is evil. But python is also incredibly flexible and I'm in the mood to be evil. This code will take effect at runtime and not compile time. You could do something similar for return type. Something like this could be useful for debugging and, because it's a decorator, it's easy enough to remove.

    For it to be useful for debugging you would have to have a situation where two types had all the same attributes that were getting accessed but with different semantics. So that's a pretty limited case. Other than that, you're about to get a typerror anyways when this code runs. The good news is that this is almost never a problem. I really don't know why people from statically typed languages make such a big deal over it.

    def types(*args, **kwargs):
        arg_types = args
        kwarg_types = kwargs
        def decorator(f):
            def func(*args, **kwargs):
                for arg, arg_type in zip(args, arg_types):
                    if not isinstance(arg, arg_type):
                        raise TypeError("Wrong type suckah")
                for kw, arg in kwargs.items():
                    if not isinstance(arg, kwarg_types[kw]):
                        raise TypeError("this is a bad error message")
                return f(*args, **kwargs)
            return func
        return decorator
    
    @types(int, str, bool, flag=bool)
    def demo(i, strng, flag=False):
        print i, strng, flag
    
    demo(1, "foo", True)
    
    try:
        demo("foo", "bar", flag="foobar")
    except TypeError:
        print "busted on posargs"
    
    try:
        demo(1, "foo", flag=2)
    except TypeError:
        print "busted on keyargs"
    
    try:
        demo(1, "foo", 3)
    except TypeError:
        print "no use sneaking it through"
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-23 13:29

    No.

    In Python, it's the program's responsibility to use built-in functions like isinstance() and issubclass() to test variable types and correct usage. Python tries to stay out of your way while giving you all you need to implement strong type checking.

    from Why is Python a dynamic language and also a strongly typed language. Also

    In a dynamically typed language, a variable is simply a value bound to a name; the value has a type -- like "integer" or "string" or "list" -- but the variable itself doesn't. You could have a variable which, right now, holds a number, and later assign a string to it if you need it to change.

    Further, isinstance() and issubclass() can be used to do type-checking. If you want to make sure that argument is of MyClass type, you can have a check inside the function. You can even type-cast the value of the argument (if you have a constructor accepting such value) and assign it to my_object.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-23 13:38

    Python 3.x has function annotations where you can declare argument and return types:

    def myMethod(argument: MyClass) -> str:
       ...
    

    But currently Python does nothing with them, they serve as documentation only.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-23 13:44

    No, there is not.

    In fact, checking types is considered "un-Pythonic", because an object of any type that looks enough like the expected type should be treated equally.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题