It\'s functionality is so strong that I worry about its stability and performance.
What do you think?
UPDATE
What I\'m doing is this:
debug_backtrace
is relatively expensive in my experience, so you should be careful it is not used in loops (e.g. in a custom error handler that catches warnings or notices and performs a backtrace every time).
For any kind of error logging, I think it's pretty invaluable, and because it's going to be called only once, definitely not a performance problem. It is surely always good to include a backtrace in an error report.
I can't see why there would be any specific issues with this function's stability (i.e. calling it causing another crash), I've never heard of any problems. The only "gotcha" I can see is this note in the User Contributed Notes when using objects as function parameters that have no _toString
method defined.
Of course, you should never output the results of a backtrace to the end user - that goes without saying.
Well, considering its name, I'm not sure I would use it as a "normal" part of my application -- even though I don't remember having read anything which said that it was either good nor bad.
I don't really know what you mean about "serious usage", but :
Though, not sure that "error logging" corresponds to your definition of serious usage ?
Ok, from my understanding, the problem is following
You've got a php file, let's call it "main.php". In "main.php" you're including "A.php" from some directory:
# in "main.php"
include '/some/dir/A.php';
A.php, in turn, includes 'B.php', which is in the same directory as A.php
# in "A.php"
include 'B.php';
the problem: since "/some/dir/" (where A and B reside) is not the current for "main.php", php does not see B.php
from A.php
the solution: in A.php
use an absolute full path to /some/dir
. Either hardcode it or obtain it dynamically via dirname(__FILE__)
# in "A.php"
include dirname(__FILE__) .'/B.php';