Is SQL DATEDIFF(year, …, …) an Expensive Computation?

前端 未结 3 1770
渐次进展
渐次进展 2021-01-19 16:08

I\'m trying to optimize up some horrendously complicated SQL queries because it takes too long to finish.

In my queries, I have dynamically created SQL statements wi

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-01-19 16:33

    DATEDIFF is quite efficient compared to other methods of handling of datetime values, like strings. (see this SO answer).

    In this case, it sounds like you going over and over the same data, which is likely more expensive than using a temp table. For example, statistics will be generated.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-19 16:52

    One thing you might be able do to improve performance might be to put an index on the temp table on MID.

    Check your execution plan to see if it helps (may depend on the number of rows in the temp table).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-19 16:54

    It depends on exactly what you are doing to be honest as to the extent of the performance hit.

    For example, if you are using DATEDIFF (or indeed any other function) within a WHERE clause, then this will be a cause of poorer performance as it will prevent an index being used on that column.

    e.g. basic example, finding all records in 2009

    WHERE DATEDIFF(yyyy, DateColumn, '2009-01-01') = 0
    

    would not make good use of an index on DateColumn. Whereas a better solution, providing optimal index usage would be:

    WHERE DateColumn >= '2009-01-01' AND DateColumn < '2010-01-01'
    

    I recently blogged about the difference this makes (with performance stats/execution plan comparisons), if you're interested.

    That would be costlier than say returning DATEDIFF as a column in the resultset.

    I would start by identifying the individual queries that are taking the most time. Check the execution plans to see where the problem lies and tune from there.

    Edit: Based on the example query you've given, here's an approach you could try out to remove the use of DATEDIFF within the WHERE clause. Basic example to find everyone who was 10 years old on a given date - I think the maths is right, but you get the idea anyway! Gave it a quick test, and seems fine. Should be easy enough to adapt to your scenario. If you want to find people between (e.g.) 15 and 17 years old on a given date, then that's also possible with this approach.

    -- Assuming @Date2 is set to the date at which you want to calculate someone's age 
    DECLARE @AgeAtDate INTEGER
    SET @AgeAtDate = 10  
    
    DECLARE @BornFrom DATETIME
    DECLARE @BornUntil DATETIME
    SELECT @BornFrom = DATEADD(yyyy, -(@AgeAtDate + 1), @Date2)
    SELECT @BornUntil = DATEADD(yyyy, -@AgeAtDate , @Date2)
    
    SELECT DOB
    FROM YourTable
    WHERE DOB > @BornFrom AND DOB <= @BornUntil
    

    An important note to add, is for age caculates from DOB, this approach is more accurate. Your current implementation only takes the year of birth into account, not the actual day (e.g. someone born on 1st Dec 2009 would show as being 1 year old on 1st Jan 2010 when they are not 1 until 1st Dec 2010).

    Hope this helps.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题