implicit int and implicit declaration of functions with gcc compiler

后端 未结 3 1031
被撕碎了的回忆
被撕碎了的回忆 2021-01-19 06:24

I read in the c99 Standard:

-remove implicit function declaration,

-remove implicit int.

But when I try to compile this code with gcc comp

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-01-19 06:52

    I don't believe the compiler is required to produce a fatal error. Use -Werror if you're concerned...

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-19 06:53

    The C standard requires a diagnostic for any translation unit containing a violation of a syntax rule or constraint. It does not require such diagnostics to be fatal; the compiler is free to continue processing the source file. The behavior of the resulting executable, if any, is undefined. The standard makes no distinction between warnings and fatal errors.

    (The only thing that requires a compiler to reject a source file is the #error directive.)

    Conclusion: when compiling C, take warnings very seriously.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-19 06:54

    Two points: first, it may (usually does) take a specific set of flags to get a compiler to conform with the standard.

    Second, all that's required by the standard is that the implementation issue a "diagnostic" in the case of an error -- but it's up to the implementation to define what is or isn't a diagnostic. It's free to say a "warning" is a diagnostic if it wants to. When a diagnostic is issued, it may quit compiling, or it can compile the code anyway.

    Bottom line: what it's doing is probably enough to conform, for whatever that's worth.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题